Energy and conservation of momentum confusion

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between energy, force, and momentum in the context of a bullet being fired from a gun. It highlights that while both the bullet and the gun experience equal force due to Newton's third law, their kinetic energies differ significantly due to their mass disparity and the squared velocity factor in the kinetic energy formula. The conservation of momentum explains the velocities of both objects post-firing, illustrating that the bullet, being much lighter, achieves a much higher speed and thus greater kinetic energy. The conversation clarifies that energy conservation alone does not fully explain the energy distribution in this scenario; rather, it requires considering all forms of energy involved. Ultimately, the bullet's kinetic energy can be vastly greater than that of the gun due to its lower mass and higher velocity.
Jimmy87
Messages
692
Reaction score
19
If you consider a bullet firing from a gun then you have conservation of momentum and a Newton's third law pair (according to what i have read on the internet anyway). They both experience the same force if they are a third law pair but, generally, what is it that determines which object receives more energy? For instance, the bullet has a huge kinetic energy after the gun has fired whereas the gun has very little. So where does energy conservation fit into this example and what is the relationship between energy and force (if there is one)? They are both receiving the same force yet experience different energies?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The relationship between kinetic energy and force is the work energy theorem. It states that ##\frac{1}{2}mv^{2}(x) - \frac{1}{2}mv^{2}(x_0) = \int _{x_0}^{x}F(x')dx'##.
 
Jimmy87 said:
So where does energy conservation fit into this example and what is the relationship between energy and force (if there is one)?
It doesn't.
The kinetic energy is not conserved in this process.
It is like the reverse of a plastic (non-elastic) collision.
The initial KE is zero, the final KE is not.

The distribution of KE is determined by the masses of the two objects.
And maybe the external factors.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
WannabeNewton said:
The relationship between kinetic energy and force is the work energy theorem. It states that ##\frac{1}{2}mv^{2}(x) - \frac{1}{2}mv^{2}(x_0) = \int _{x_0}^{x}F(x')dx'##.
This is of no help in this problem!
You are correct to realize that the bullet and the gun are a "Newtons 3rd law pair"
However conservation of energy is not enough to sort out the details, conservation of energy requires consideration of all the energies involved in the interaction.
 
technician said:
This is of no help in this problem!
You are correct to realize that the bullet and the gun are a "Newtons 3rd law pair"
However conservation of energy is not enough to sort out the details, conservation of energy requires consideration of all the energies involved in the interaction.
What are you even talking about? He asked for a relationship between force and kinetic energy. The work energy theorem doesn't require conservation of energy to hold. The determination of the final velocities of the two objects involved in the process only requires conservation of momentum and by itself illuminates why the significantly more massive object doesn't have a recoil velocity comparable to the exit velocity of the smaller mass; he asked for something extra.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Jimmy87 said:
For instance, the bullet has a huge kinetic energy after the gun has fired whereas the gun has very little.
Are you sure about this? It is not obvious.
The bullet has a high speed and the gun has a much smaller recoil speed.
But the mass of the bullet is much smaller than that of the gun.
Their kinetic energies my be quite similar.
 
Jimmy, you are right, an equal force acts on both. Both the bullet and the gun will receive equal momentum (mv), so if you know the masses of each and the velocity after firing of one, you can work out the velocity of the other. You can then calculate the kinetic energy (mv^2)/2 of each. You will find that the kinetic energy of the bullet is greater because of the squared factor.

When the gun fires, chemical energy in the exposive is converted to kinetic energy.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Jimmy87 said:
If you consider a bullet firing from a gun then you have conservation of momentum and a Newton's third law pair (according to what i have read on the internet anyway). They both experience the same force if they are a third law pair but, generally, what is it that determines which object receives more energy? For instance, the bullet has a huge kinetic energy after the gun has fired whereas the gun has very little.
Yes.

M = gun's mass; V = gun's velocity after shot
m = bullet's mass; v = bullet's velocity after shot

momentum conservation:

MV + mv = 0 → v = -(M/m) V

from here you see that |v| > |V|.

Now let's see kinetic energy T:

Tgun = 1/2 M V2
Tbullet = 1/2 m v2 = 1/2 m (-M/m)2 V2 = 1/2 (M2/m) V2

Tbullet/Tgun = M/m.

So, for example, if m = 20g and M = 5kg, Tbullet is 250 times Tgun.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Wow that's a lot of very useful information, thanks to all!
 
Back
Top