Energy Balance During Bungy Jumping

AI Thread Summary
During bungy jumping, kinetic energy is zero at the lowest point, raising questions about the relationship between elastic potential energy (P.E.) and gravitational P.E. The discussion highlights that potential energy is always measured relative to a reference point, which is not clearly defined. While one might consider the jump height or ground level as reference points, this leads to complications in comparing potential energies. It is emphasized that potential energies cannot be directly compared due to their arbitrary values, but changes in potential energy can be compared if they start from the same value. The conversation ultimately underscores the importance of defining reference points when discussing energy balance in this context.
7bear
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
When we are playing bungy jump, we are instantaneous at rest at the bottom(K.E=0).
At that time, is elastic P.E. greater than gravitational P.E? :confused:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Potential energy relative to what?? Potential energy is always measured relative to some point and you haven't told us what that point is. My first guess would be "relative to the point from which you jumped" but in that case the potential energy would be negative and the question is trivial. My second guess would be "relative to
the ground but you haven't told us the height above the ground.
 
comparing potential energies

You can't comapre potential energies. Because their value are chose arbitrarily. but sure you can compare change in potential energies.

So, if your potential energies initially have the same value, then a direct comparison is possible.

spacetime
http://www.geocities.com/physics_all/index.html
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top