Energy Balance Spring Slider system

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the average velocity of a block in a spring slider system, where an electric engine pulls the spring at a constant velocity. The challenge lies in accounting for the varying force applied by the engine as the block begins to slip after a certain force threshold is reached. Participants suggest using integration over time to solve the problem, emphasizing that the force from the engine changes with position. They clarify that the spring's extension, rather than its displacement, should be used in calculations, and recommend drawing a free-body diagram to apply Newton's laws effectively. The motion of the system can become complex, potentially leading to oscillation unless critically damped.
SquareCircles
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I am currently looking facing a problem concerning a spring slider system.
The system consists of a electro engine that pulls on a spring with a constant velocity. The spring is attached to a block that sticks to the surface, but after a certain force is applied (by the spring) starts to slip and move a certain distance. I want to calculate the average velocity during the slip event. To get an as close to realistic situation as possible the force applied by the electric engine during the slip event also has to be taken into accound.
So far I came up with this:
F*vpull velocity electric engine=0.5kxdisplacement spring^2+0.5m(vblock^2-mgxdisplacement block(mu)
Now I have been told that I can solve the problem by integration over time. But I am rather confused as to how I can do this.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You cannot pull with a constant velocity - you can move at a constant velocity.
To move at a constant velocity while pulling one a spring means that the force supplied by the engine varies with it's position.

Fv is the rate that energy is arriving via the engine - it is energy per unit time.
Everything on the other side is energy. So your units don't match.
x in the equation 0.5kx^2 is not the displacement of the spring, it is the extension of the spring.

You can probably work it out by forces if you track the position of the engine as ##x_e(t)=x_i+vt##, the position of the block is ##x_b(t)##, and the unstretched length of the spring is ##s## ... and put ##x_b(0)=0##. Draw a free-body diagram for the block, and apply Newton's laws. Don't forget there will be static as well as kinetic friction.

The motion can get quite complicated - the mass will oscillate unless critically damped, and may catch and stick sometimes if the static friction is high enough.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top