Energy conservation in elastic multi-dimenstional collisions

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a programmer's challenge with energy conservation in elastic collisions involving two discs with different masses and velocities. The user initially attempts to conserve both angular and translational kinetic energy but realizes they have a single equation with four unknowns. Respondents clarify that kinetic energy is not conserved in such collisions due to friction and suggest the need for additional equations, including momentum conservation and constraints on velocity at the collision point. The user plans to incorporate these suggestions and will update the forum with their progress.
randunel
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone. I believe that I'm in the right place for this topic. If not, please excuse me for the misplacement :)

I am a programmer, not a physicist, so please excuse my lack of knowledge. I currently need help with an energy conservation problem.

I am currently working on this problem: i have two discs (perfectly round, equal diameter d and equal mass distribution, but different masses m1 and m2) traveling at different translational velocities v, with different angular speeds ω. These two discs collide with each other at a random point in time t1, with a random Θ angle between their velocity vectors.

From what I remember since high school, the total kinetic energy is conserved within an isolated system. Thus, I conserve both angular kinetic energy and translational kinetic energy:

\frac{1}{2}ω1i2m1d2+\frac{1}{2}m1v1i2 + \frac{1}{2}ω2i2m2d2+\frac{1}{2}m2v2i2 = \frac{1}{2}ω1f2m1d2+\frac{1}{2}m1v1f2 + \frac{1}{2}ω2f2m2d2+\frac{1}{2}m2v2f2
I don't know where to go from here, since i have a single equation with 4 unknown variables.


But, looking at the problem from another angle, I was trying to conserve the total energy:
E = Ekin + Epot = constant
Epot = \frac{kx^{2}}{2}
-\frac{\delta E}{\delta x} = -kx = F
And this is what I'm interested in, Fx and Fy on each disc.

Having the velocity of disc1
V(r) = \vdots \stackrel{0,d_{12}>d}{\frac{k(d_{12}-d)^{2}}{2},d_{12}\leq d}
where d12 = distance between centers of discs 1 and 2
We can derivate
F1x = -\frac{\delta v}{\delta x} = -\frac{\delta}{\delta x} [ \frac{k(d_{12}-d)^{2}}{2} ] = k(r12-d) * \frac{\delta}{\delta x} ( d_{12}-d )

And so on, typing formulas in here is really time-consuming.

Am I going in the right place with this? Or am I too off-course, away from my target?
I just want the final velocities, translation and rotation (or accelerations of some sort).
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Is there anyone you'd recommend me to go to and maybe send a private message to?
 
randunel said:
Thus, I conserve both angular kinetic energy and translational kinetic energy:
\frac{1}{2}ω1i2m1d2+\frac{1}{2}m1v1i2 + \frac{1}{2}ω2i2m2d2+\frac{1}{2}m2v2i2 = \frac{1}{2}ω1f2m1d2+\frac{1}{2}m1v1f2 + \frac{1}{2}ω2f2m2d2+\frac{1}{2}m2v2f2
I don't know where to go from here, since i have a single equation with 4 unknown variables.
1. You should rather say: I conserve sum of angular kinetic energy and translational kinetic energy: Anyway in such collision kinetic energy is not conserved - some must be dissipated on friction
2. Formulas you used for angular kinetic energy are wrong, but (as 1. was wrong) it doesn't matter
3. Thus you need 4 (not 3) more equations:
3.a. two of momentum conservation (only two, as the problem is two-dimensional)
3.b. Constraint that at the point of collision velocities of points at edges of both discs must be the same
3.c. Total angular momentum must be conserved.
 
Thank you for the reply, I will try to work with a,b,c from here on, I'll post back with the results (if any, since i can hardly remember the high school physics :D).
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top