Energy conservation in elastic multi-dimenstional collisions

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a programmer's challenge with energy conservation in elastic collisions involving two discs with different masses and velocities. The user initially attempts to conserve both angular and translational kinetic energy but realizes they have a single equation with four unknowns. Respondents clarify that kinetic energy is not conserved in such collisions due to friction and suggest the need for additional equations, including momentum conservation and constraints on velocity at the collision point. The user plans to incorporate these suggestions and will update the forum with their progress.
randunel
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone. I believe that I'm in the right place for this topic. If not, please excuse me for the misplacement :)

I am a programmer, not a physicist, so please excuse my lack of knowledge. I currently need help with an energy conservation problem.

I am currently working on this problem: i have two discs (perfectly round, equal diameter d and equal mass distribution, but different masses m1 and m2) traveling at different translational velocities v, with different angular speeds ω. These two discs collide with each other at a random point in time t1, with a random Θ angle between their velocity vectors.

From what I remember since high school, the total kinetic energy is conserved within an isolated system. Thus, I conserve both angular kinetic energy and translational kinetic energy:

\frac{1}{2}ω1i2m1d2+\frac{1}{2}m1v1i2 + \frac{1}{2}ω2i2m2d2+\frac{1}{2}m2v2i2 = \frac{1}{2}ω1f2m1d2+\frac{1}{2}m1v1f2 + \frac{1}{2}ω2f2m2d2+\frac{1}{2}m2v2f2
I don't know where to go from here, since i have a single equation with 4 unknown variables.


But, looking at the problem from another angle, I was trying to conserve the total energy:
E = Ekin + Epot = constant
Epot = \frac{kx^{2}}{2}
-\frac{\delta E}{\delta x} = -kx = F
And this is what I'm interested in, Fx and Fy on each disc.

Having the velocity of disc1
V(r) = \vdots \stackrel{0,d_{12}>d}{\frac{k(d_{12}-d)^{2}}{2},d_{12}\leq d}
where d12 = distance between centers of discs 1 and 2
We can derivate
F1x = -\frac{\delta v}{\delta x} = -\frac{\delta}{\delta x} [ \frac{k(d_{12}-d)^{2}}{2} ] = k(r12-d) * \frac{\delta}{\delta x} ( d_{12}-d )

And so on, typing formulas in here is really time-consuming.

Am I going in the right place with this? Or am I too off-course, away from my target?
I just want the final velocities, translation and rotation (or accelerations of some sort).
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Is there anyone you'd recommend me to go to and maybe send a private message to?
 
randunel said:
Thus, I conserve both angular kinetic energy and translational kinetic energy:
\frac{1}{2}ω1i2m1d2+\frac{1}{2}m1v1i2 + \frac{1}{2}ω2i2m2d2+\frac{1}{2}m2v2i2 = \frac{1}{2}ω1f2m1d2+\frac{1}{2}m1v1f2 + \frac{1}{2}ω2f2m2d2+\frac{1}{2}m2v2f2
I don't know where to go from here, since i have a single equation with 4 unknown variables.
1. You should rather say: I conserve sum of angular kinetic energy and translational kinetic energy: Anyway in such collision kinetic energy is not conserved - some must be dissipated on friction
2. Formulas you used for angular kinetic energy are wrong, but (as 1. was wrong) it doesn't matter
3. Thus you need 4 (not 3) more equations:
3.a. two of momentum conservation (only two, as the problem is two-dimensional)
3.b. Constraint that at the point of collision velocities of points at edges of both discs must be the same
3.c. Total angular momentum must be conserved.
 
Thank you for the reply, I will try to work with a,b,c from here on, I'll post back with the results (if any, since i can hardly remember the high school physics :D).
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top