Energy conservation vs momentum conservation in SHM

AI Thread Summary
In the discussion on energy conservation versus momentum conservation in simple harmonic motion (SHM), a problem is presented where a mass M attached to a spring experiences a change when a smaller mass m is added. Momentum conservation is correctly applied, leading to the ratio A1/A2 = (M+m/M)1/2. However, energy conservation fails because the addition of mass m is akin to an inelastic collision, where energy is not conserved due to external forces doing work. The participants clarify that energy is not conserved in this scenario, resolving the confusion around the calculations. The conclusion emphasizes the distinction between momentum and energy conservation in such systems.
nikhilarora
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


a mass M , attached to a horizontal spring executes SHM(simple harmonic motion) with amplitude A1 . when the mass M passes through its mean position then a smaller mass m is placed over it and both of them move together with amplitude A2 . the ratio A1/A2 is ...?


Homework Equations


taking angular frequency = ω

The Attempt at a Solution



first taking two mass and spring as the system, since there is no external force momentum remain conserved , applying (M)(ω1)(A1) = (M+m)(ω2)(A2) , i get correct answer but while applying energy conservation equations, i get an incorrect answer!
will energy not remain conserved in such process?

please help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi nikhilarora,

You might have done something wrong. Show your work.

ehild
 
ehild said:
Hi nikhilarora,

You might have done something wrong. Show your work.

ehild

using k=spring constant
applying momentum conservation :

M*(ω1)*A1 = (m+M)*(ω2)*A2
=>M*(k/M)1/2*A1 = (m+M)*(k/m+M)1/2*A2

=> A1/A2 = (M+m/M)1/2

applying energy conservation :

1/2 * M*(ω1)2 * A12 = 1/2 * (m+M) * (ω2)2 * A22
=> M*(k/M)*A12 = (m+M)*(k/m+M)*A22
=> A12=A22
=> A1=A2

where have i done wrong ??
 
I see. The energy is not conserved when you put the small mass on the vibrating one. It is like an inelastic collision: the masses move together. So the bigger mass has to accelerate up the smaller one, and that happens with the assistance of friction or some other force which does work.

ehild
 
ehild said:
I see. The energy is not conserved when you put the small mass on the vibrating one. It is like an inelastic collision: the masses move together. So the bigger mass has to accelerate up the smaller one, and that happens with the assistance of friction or some other force which does work.

ehild

thanks a lot !
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top