How Does Air Resistance Affect Terminal Velocity and Impact Energy?

  • Thread starter Thread starter acg011
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Atmosphere Energy
AI Thread Summary
Air resistance significantly impacts terminal velocity and impact energy, as a falling object reaches a constant speed where gravitational force equals drag force. Regardless of the height from which an object is dropped, it will strike the ground with the same energy once terminal velocity is achieved, meaning additional height does not increase impact energy. The potential energy at greater heights is offset by work done against air resistance, which drains excess energy. Formulas can incorporate drag and other variables like air temperature and pressure, but their contribution to the overall effect may vary in significance. Ultimately, while additional factors can refine calculations, they may not be necessary for practical applications.
acg011
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Potential energy: so I guess one form of potential energy would be using mass and gravity and height. Question, in the real world if you take a ball up to 50' and drop it at some point it would reach terminal velocity. Then say you take it up to 2000' and drop it it, it would reach that same veocity and the energy that it would have would be the same when it impacted the ground. If you take it up to say 200,000' and drop it it would go much quicker without all that pesky air resistance right. Then it would slow down and still hit with the same energy as at 50'. Is that right or am I way off? say though you observed the ball at 100,000' and the ball was dropped from 200,000' the ball could pass you going oh I don't know mach 1. Is there a formula that takes drag into account, would it even be worth it to incorperate a formula that's uses air temp. and pressure? Is that all even needed?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, there is a height at which a ball reaches terminal velocity and, as a result, dropping the ball from any greater height will always result in it striking the ground with the same energy. Keep in mind that these greater heights correspond to greater initial potential energy but work due to friction drains away this extra potential energy. You can include drag in your formulas, this corresponds to the inclusion of friction when you sum forces. In the real world, friction is usually velocity dependent and is often really messy. As far as air temp. and pressure...sure, you could also throw in humidity, thermal expansion of the ball at different heights, etc. there all all sorts of things that would be necesssary to get it exactly right. The real issue is whether these extra variable contribute enough to have an appreciable affect on the answer. Thermal expansion is clearly overkill, but the others...
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
Back
Top