Energy levels of atoms and spectroscopic analysis

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the origins of energy levels and sublevels in atoms, specifically whether these were derived from spectroscopic analyses of energy emission and absorption or if they were concluded independently. The conversation touches on the interplay between spectroscopy and quantum mechanics in understanding atomic structure.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that energy levels and sublevels of atoms were obtained through historical spectral analyses.
  • Others argue that experimental spectroscopy provides energy differences that atoms may absorb or emit, which are explained by quantum mechanics using four quantum numbers.
  • A participant questions the sequence of understanding between energy levels and spectroscopy, suggesting they progressed together.
  • There is a request for clarification on how quantum mechanics is applied to explain electronic energy levels, with some noting the complexity of the subject and the limitations of forum discussions for such detailed explanations.
  • Participants mention that solving Schrödinger's equation is fundamental in determining energy levels, particularly for the hydrogen atom, but acknowledge that this is a simplified case.
  • Discussion includes references to multi-electron systems and the challenges in finding exact solutions for more complex atomic structures.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying degrees of understanding regarding the relationship between spectroscopy and the determination of energy levels, with no clear consensus on the sequence of discoveries or the depth of explanation possible in the forum format.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the complexity of quantum mechanics, the need for prerequisite knowledge to fully engage with the topic, and the unresolved nature of discussions regarding multi-electron systems and approximations in quantum solutions.

MartinG
Messages
27
Reaction score
4
Hello !

My question is how the energy levels and sublevels that atoms are considered to have were obtained, and if these energy levels and sublevels were obtained as a result of the different spectroscopic analyzes of energy emission and absorption of atoms, or as it was concluded that atoms have the energy levels and sublevels that atoms are currently considered to have ?

Thanks for your answers.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
MartinG said:
Hello !

My question is how the energy levels and sublevels that atoms are considered to have were obtained, and if these energy levels and sublevels were obtained as a result of the different spectroscopic analyzes of energy emission and absorption of atoms, or as it was concluded that atoms have the energy levels and sublevels that atoms are currently considered to have ?

Thanks for your answers.
This might be worth studying:

http://www.columbia.edu/~nas2173/Lab7_SpectrumOfTheHydrogenAtomNS.pdf
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: MartinG
Thanks Perok !So my question is answered like this:

The levels and sublevels of energy that atoms are considered to be made of, are obtained from the conclusions made by the spectral analyzes made throughout history to the different atoms ?
 
MartinG said:
Thanks Perok !So my question is answered like this:

The levels and sublevels of energy that atoms are considered to be made of, are obtained from the conclusions made by the spectral analyzes made throughout history to the different atoms ?
To be precise, experimental spectroscopy gives you energy differences that each atom or molecule may absorb or emit. The QM model of the atom explains this in terms of energy levels based on four quantum numbers.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Twigg and MartinG
MartinG said:
My question is how the energy levels and sublevels that atoms are considered to have were obtained, and if these energy levels and sublevels were obtained as a result of the different spectroscopic analyzes of energy emission and absorption of atoms, or as it was concluded that atoms have the energy levels and sublevels that atoms are currently considered to have ?
Your question is a bit difficult to understand, but I believe you're asking how we discovered the energy levels that atoms and molecules have, and if we used spectroscopic analysis to do so. The answer to this question is yes, we used spectroscopic analysis combined with quantum mechanics to obtain and explain the different electronic energy levels of atoms and molecules.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: MartinG
I also don't quite understand the question, but it seems to be related to "which came first" - understanding of energy levels or understanding spectroscopy. They progressed together.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Twigg and MartinG
Drakkith said:
Your question is a bit difficult to understand, but I believe you're asking how we discovered the energy levels that atoms and molecules have, and if we used spectroscopic analysis to do so.
Yes, my question is that.

And to continue with this topic I ask you again how you use the "quantum mechanics" to obtain and explain the different electronic energy levels of atoms and molecules.

I appreciate you if you can explain a little more about how you use quantum mechanics for this.

Greetings.
 
There are entire books on the subject. It's not easy to condense a book into a few lines.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: aaroman and MartinG
MartinG said:
And to continue with this topic I ask you again how you use the "quantum mechanics" to obtain and explain the different electronic energy levels of atoms and molecules.
I'm afraid my experience with doing detailed quantum mechanics never got past the very basics that I needed for my 201 solid state chemistry class. As V50 said, it's a deep and detailed subject with many, many books written about it. It can't be explained in a forum post if you don't have any of the prerequisite knowledge.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Vanadium 50
  • #11
MartinG said:
I ask you again how you use the "quantum mechanics" to obtain and explain the different electronic energy levels of atoms and molecules.

I appreciate you if you can explain a little more about how you use quantum mechanics for this.
Basically, you solve Schrödinger's equation for the system in question. Undergraduate physics students learn how to do this for the hydrogen atom, which is the simplest case (one electrron in a ##1/r## potential). I learned many of the details in a second-year "introduction to modern physics" course (and later taught such a course for many years), and the rest in full-on quantum mechanics courses.

A Google search for "hydrogen atom Schrödinger equation" finds many sets of university lecture notes. Here's one that appears to follow the book that I taught my "intro modern" course out of (Beiser's Concepts of Modern Physics).

https://web.mst.edu/~sparlin/phys107/lecture/chap06.pdf
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: aaroman, PeroK and hutchphd
  • #12
Of course that's the tip of the iceberg - even within the hydrogen atom. Fine structure, hyperfine structure, relativistic corrections. At MIT, when I took 8.05, the second semester of QM, it was nicknamed "the hydrogen atom" because that was the bulk of the course. Not everything, of course: there was also the H2+ ion. :smile:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: aaroman, PeroK and Drakkith
  • #13
Yep. Then there are the multi-electron systems: atoms other than hydrogen; molecules; solid-state systems like crystals; etc.
 
  • #14
jtbell said:
multi-electron systems
Actually, H2+ and H- are the same problem, as is the helium atom. Sort of.

One has two electrons in the potential of the proton (or the potential of an alpha particle), and the other has two protons in the potential of the electron. If you had an exact solution to one, you'd have the exact solution to the other.

However, there is no exact solution, and the approximations for the various alternatives are completely different.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Astronuc

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
679
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
37
Views
6K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
7K