Energy Loss From Permanent Magnets

AI Thread Summary
Permanent magnets do not expend energy when attracting objects, similar to how gravity operates. When a magnet attracts an object, it converts potential energy into kinetic energy, but this energy does not deplete the magnet itself. The energy involved in the attraction comes from the magnetic field, which changes rather than diminishes. When the object is pulled away, the magnetic field is not rejuvenated in the traditional sense, but rather, its energy dynamics shift. Overall, the magnet maintains its properties without losing energy through the attraction process.
Eugbug
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
Here's a question I posted about 10 years ago as a member of the forum. No one seemed to provide a satisfactory answer then so maybe someone might have some ideas on the subject:

When a permanent magnet attracts an object it does work and loses energy.
When the object is pulled away is the magnetic field rejuvenated to some extent and energy transferred back to the magnet?
I often wondered about this because the magnetic catches on cupboard doors never seem to wear out which would happen if all the magnetic potential energy was used up.
The magnet is in a fixed position and exerts a force on the piece of metal on the door. The door is accelerated by the force so it gains kinetic energy and the only source of energy in the system is from the magnetic field of the magnet.
There must be energy transfer from the magnet in order to accelerate the door and give it kinetic energy.

This is the conversation in the forum from then:

http://physicspost.com/physicsforums/topic.asp-ARCHIVE=&TOPIC_ID=4161.htm
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The force from a magnet does not require an expenditure of energy to function. In a similar way, gravity doesn't require it either. Note that you cannot get repeatable work from a permanent magnet if all you are doing is allowing an object to be attracted to it in such a manner.

Edit: I don't know for sure, but it would appear to me to be similar to potential energy related to gravity. The potential energy is converted to kinetic and then lost when the object impacts the magnet. But again, I'm not sure.
 
Last edited:
When the door is moved close to the magnet and is let go, the magnet does work as it moves the mass of the door through a distance. That is the definition of work. The energy to do this must come from the magnet.
Presumably the same thing would happen if a distant object is moved into the influence of Earths gravity. The gravitational force would attract the body giving it velocity and kinetic energy. On impact, some of energy would be dissipated as heat.
 
Last edited:
The energy does not come from the magnet. The magnetic field energy changes.
It is the same when when a proton attracts an electron, the field energy changes, but not the proton.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top