Energy Loss Q: Find Velocity, Acceleration & Mechanical Energy Lost

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on a physics problem involving a rope falling through a hole in a table, where participants analyze the velocity and acceleration of the rope as well as the mechanical energy lost. The equations for velocity and acceleration have been derived, with v(x) = (2gx/3)^(0.5) and a(x) = [(2g/3)^(0.5)] / 2√x. A key point raised is the inelastic nature of the rope, which causes an impulse effect as new sections accelerate, conserving momentum but not work. Participants debate the calculation of mechanical energy loss, noting that it involves the difference between the kinetic energy of the rope sections and the change in potential energy, despite the lack of a specified table height. Ultimately, it is concluded that once a section passes through the hole, no further work is lost, making the height irrelevant for energy loss calculations.
deedsy
Messages
81
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A (smooth) rope of length L and mass m is placed above a hole in a table. One end of the rope falls through the hole, pulling steadily on the remainder of the rope. Find the velocity of the rope as a function of the distance to the end of the rope, x. Ignore friction of the rope as it unwinds. Then find the acceleration of the falling rope and the mechanical energy lost from the rope as the end of the rope leaves the table. Note that the rope length is less than the height of the table.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


Well I already got the right equations for v and a...

v(x) = (2gx/3)^.5
a(x) = [(2g/3)^.5] / 2√x

But I don't understand how to find the mechanical energy loss. It seems like mechanical energy shouldn't be lost here, because the lost PE is just changing into KE...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is a tricky question that comes up regularly in various guises.
It should state that the rope is inelastic. This means something interesting happens as each new piece is accelerated from rest, apparently instantaneously, to the current speed of the descending part. This constitutes an impulse, so momentum is conserved but not work.
 
haruspex said:
This is a tricky question that comes up regularly in various guises.
It should state that the rope is inelastic. This means something interesting happens as each new piece is accelerated from rest, apparently instantaneously, to the current speed of the descending part. This constitutes an impulse, so momentum is conserved but not work.

So the change in mechanical energy would be the difference between the sum of all kinetic energies of small sections of the rope and the change in Potential Energy? But how would you know the change in PE if they don't give you a table height?

I got mgL/6 for the sum of all the KE of all small sections of the rope.
 
deedsy said:
So the change in mechanical energy would be the difference between the sum of all kinetic energies of small sections of the rope and the change in Potential Energy? But how would you know the change in PE if they don't give you a table height?

I got mgL/6 for the sum of all the KE of all small sections of the rope.

Once a section of rope has passed through the hole there will b no further loss of work, so the height does not matter.
Let the length of the rope that has passed through the hole be x and the current speed of that section be v. Consider a small section length dx passing through the hole, going from rest to speed v, and apply conservation of momentum.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top