Energy of individual particles

  • Thread starter Thread starter haael
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Particles
haael
Messages
537
Reaction score
35
So OK, we have a Fock space of some particles of one kind.
Then we have energy operator that acts on the states and returns some value. The action of this operator on the whole space is derived from the behaviour on single particle states.

Now my question: how can we measure the energy of individual particles?

The energy operator only gives us the sum of all energies. We would have to define n energy operators, one for each particle. How to do this so they not interfere with each other?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, in each n-particle sector of the Fock space you can define n different energy operators - one for each particle. This is no different from how it is done in standard n-particle quantum mechanics. In this n-particle sector the non-interacting total energy operator

H = \int d^3p \omega_p a^{\dag}_pa_p

is exactly equal to the sum of n one-particle energies.

Eugene.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In her YouTube video Bell’s Theorem Experiments on Entangled Photons, Dr. Fugate shows how polarization-entangled photons violate Bell’s inequality. In this Insight, I will use quantum information theory to explain why such entangled photon-polarization qubits violate the version of Bell’s inequality due to John Clauser, Michael Horne, Abner Shimony, and Richard Holt known as the...
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
I asked a question related to a table levitating but I am going to try to be specific about my question after one of the forum mentors stated I should make my question more specific (although I'm still not sure why one couldn't have asked if a table levitating is possible according to physics). Specifically, I am interested in knowing how much justification we have for an extreme low probability thermal fluctuation that results in a "miraculous" event compared to, say, a dice roll. Does a...
Back
Top