Energy of Measurement - Quantum Mechanics

Evertje
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

Consider a simple harmonic oscillator in the ground state. Measuring its energy yields the ground state energy with 100% probability. Now by measuring its position (thereby changing the wavefunction) and next measuring the energy again, there is now a nonzero probability of finding the particle in an excited state.

(I've taken this example from
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Measurement_in_quantum_mechanics#Example )

If the particle has a probability of being found in a higher energy state, does this mean that this energy was somehow 'supplied' to the particle by measuring (i.e. sending photons to it to observe where it is), or just that the particle always had this energy, but by being prepared in the groundstate there was no way of measuring it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi.
Measuring the position makes energy uncertain, I think.
From uncertainty relation, delta x=0 causes delta p=infinity thus delta p^2=2m delta kinetic energy=infinity.
Regards.
 
Last edited:
sweet springs said:
Hi.
Measuring the position makes energy uncertain, I think.
From uncertainty relation, delta x=0 causes delta p=infinity thus delta p^2=2m delta kinetic energy=infinity.
Regards.

Yes. To measure the position as accurately as possible, one must use the photon (let's take photon as example, maybe one can use other method to determine the position) with high frequce. As a result, the energy the measurement take into the oscillator is
naturely high.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
According to recent podcast between Jacob Barandes and Sean Carroll, Barandes claims that putting a sensitive qubit near one of the slits of a double slit interference experiment is sufficient to break the interference pattern. Here are his words from the official transcript: Is that true? Caveats I see: The qubit is a quantum object, so if the particle was in a superposition of up and down, the qubit can be in a superposition too. Measuring the qubit in an orthogonal direction might...
Back
Top