Energy requirements of sustaining plasma vs first ionizing it.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Krejuski
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Plasma
Krejuski
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hello all,

I was wondering if it takes less energy to sustain an already ionized gas with an electric arc than it does when you are first trying to ionize the gas. I would think it would be, but I am not sure.

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The energy needed to sustain a plasma depends on the time. A better quantity is the power required to sustain it.

To get a plasma, you have to provide at least the same power, as this power corresponds to the energy loss to the environment.
The energy required to get a plasma is a completely different question.
 
yes, in a uniform environment you are correct, the power needed to generate a plasma is less than the energy needed to sustain that same plasma... for this reason two major phenomenon are seen: first over time your plasma will increase in size, and second you will be able to sustain the plasma over a greater distance than required to generate that same plasma. (this is one reason a Jacobs ladder functions...) finally the reason for this, when first the plasma is generated it has to pass through cool, slow moving gas which is not in and of itself energized, then (as described by both thermodynamics and entropy) as the plasma forms it will release heat into the environment (its hot) which will ionize the gas creating an area in which the plasma can more easily exist, it will be under lower pressure, have more energy available from the environment, and be directly interacting with fewer particles... thus "it takes less energy to sustain an already ionized gas with an electric arc than it does when you are first trying to ionize the gas"...
 
Plasma can be sustained for less

yes, in a uniform environment you are correct, the power needed to generate a plasma is less than the energy needed to sustain that same plasma... for this reason two major phenomenon are seen: first over time your plasma will increase in size, and second you will be able to sustain the plasma over a greater distance than required to generate that same plasma. (this is one reason a Jacobs ladder functions...) finally the reason for this, when first the plasma is generated it has to pass through cool, slow moving gas which is not in and of itself energized, then (as described by both thermodynamics and entropy) as the plasma forms it will release heat into the environment (its hot) which will ionize the gas creating an area in which the plasma can more easily exist, it will be under lower pressure, have more energy available from the environment, and be directly interacting with fewer particles... thus "it takes less energy to sustain an already ionized gas with an electric arc than it does when you are first trying to ionize the gas"...
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...

Similar threads

Back
Top