B Energy seems to disappear when gas is compressed?

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter Wazza
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the confusion regarding energy calculations during gas compression in an idealized, insulated chamber. The original poster initially believed that the energy increase in the gas should equal the work done on it, but found discrepancies in their calculations. Key corrections highlight that the internal energy of a diatomic ideal gas is calculated using the formula U = (5/2)PV, and that work done during adiabatic compression requires integration rather than simple averaging of pressures. The realization that the first law of thermodynamics can be used to relate work and internal energy helped clarify the misunderstanding. Ultimately, the poster was guided towards the correct approach to balance their energy equations.
Wazza
Messages
2
Reaction score
1
TL;DR Summary
Trying to find the right equations which described the energy transfer when compressing a gas.
Hi there,

I am working on a home project which involves compressing a gas and then retrieving the stored energy at a later date. Obviously in a real world scenario the recovered energy will be less than the energy it takes to compress the gas, due to system losses. However as a starting point I am trying to model the idealised situation, assuming zero losses, and am having trouble making the equations stack up. I was initially misled by isothermal equations and have now learned the difference between adiabatic and isothermal. Still, when I perform the seemingly trivial calculations, energy seems to be disappearing.

It may be simplest if I describe my question using an example.

My starting point is a belief in the first law of thermodynamics : energy cannot be created nor destroyed, in a closed system it is simply transferred from one state to another.

Suppose I have chamber which is perfectly insulated and fully sealed except for an opening for a piston which seals perfectly and is frictionless.
The chamber is full of air which starts off at atmospheric pressure.
Work is done to push the piston down which compresses the air inside the chamber.
As far as I know; Work = (the transfer of) Energy.
So the increase in energy in the gas in the chamber should equal the work done to compress it. Correct me if I'm wrong.

Let's say

Chamber is 2000 litres = 2 m^3
Piston plate is 1 m^2
Piston plate moves by 500 mm = 0.5m (down, i.e. compression)
Air inside is air pressure to start with = 101325 kPa
Temperature is 25C
Air can be thought of as an ideal diatomic gas with gamma = 1.4Energy in the chamber (to start with) is pressure x volume
= 101,325 Pa x 2 m^3
= 202,650 Joules constant = pressure x volume^gamma
= 101,325 x 2^1.4
= 267,398.3Final volume
= initial volume - (piston plate area x piston plate movement)
= 1.5 m^3 Final pressure = constant / volume_end^gamma
= 267,398.3 / (1.5^1.4)
= 151,576.14Energy in the chamber (to end with) is pressure x volume
= 151,576.14 Pa x 1.5 m^3
= 227,364.2 Joules Energy increase in the gas =
227,364 - 202,650 = 24,714work done pushing the piston = average pressure x change in volume
= 1/2(P2 + P1)(V2 - V1)

= 1/2 (151,576.14 + 101,325) (2.0 - 1.5)
= 126,450.6 x 0.5
= 63,225.3 Joules

So, the work done (63,225 Joules) is much greater than the energy increase in the gas (24,714 Joules).

Where has the energy gone ??

I note that gamma of 1.4 is an empirical value for a diatomic gas. If I arbitrarily fiddle this value to be 2.044 then I can make the energy equation balance, but arbitrarily fiddling values is not good physics. What am I missing ?

Please note that this question is not about what happens in the the real world. I am trying to start by modeling an idealised situation so that I can understand the basic physics. Once I have that, I can then start introducing losses and real world considerations.

Can anybody please tell which of my calculations are incorrect and what the right calculations should be ?
 
Science news on Phys.org
Wazza said:
Energy in the chamber (to start with) is pressure x volume

No it's not. It's nCvT (for ideal gas). Also, regarding the work - average pressure need not mean arithmetic average. It is only if pressure changed linearly.
 
Wazza said:
Energy in the chamber (to start with) is pressure x volume
= 101,325 Pa x 2 m^3
= 202,650 Joules
You are considering a diatomic ideal gas, so the internal energy is
$$
U = \frac{5}{2} PV
$$

Wazza said:
work done pushing the piston = average pressure x change in volume
= 1/2(P2 + P1)(V2 - V1)

= 1/2 (151,576.14 + 101,325) (2.0 - 1.5)
= 126,450.6 x 0.5
= 63,225.3 Joules
This equation works if the pressure changes linearly, which is not true for adiabatic compression. You have to calculate
$$
W = - \int_{V_i}^{V_f} P \, dV
$$
In order to save oneself the trouble of calculating this integral, one usually actually uses the first law to calculate work along an adiabat as ##W = - \Delta U##.
 
Thank you, thank you, thank you. That has put me on the right track now and I can make the equations balance !
 
I need to calculate the amount of water condensed from a DX cooling coil per hour given the size of the expansion coil (the total condensing surface area), the incoming air temperature, the amount of air flow from the fan, the BTU capacity of the compressor and the incoming air humidity. There are lots of condenser calculators around but they all need the air flow and incoming and outgoing humidity and then give a total volume of condensed water but I need more than that. The size of the...
Thread 'Why work is PdV and not (P+dP)dV in an isothermal process?'
Let's say we have a cylinder of volume V1 with a frictionless movable piston and some gas trapped inside with pressure P1 and temperature T1. On top of the piston lay some small pebbles that add weight and essentially create the pressure P1. Also the system is inside a reservoir of water that keeps its temperature constant at T1. The system is in equilibrium at V1, P1, T1. Now let's say i put another very small pebble on top of the piston (0,00001kg) and after some seconds the system...
Back
Top