Energy seems to disappear when gas is compressed?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Wazza
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the energy discrepancies encountered when compressing gas in a perfectly insulated chamber, specifically focusing on the differences between adiabatic and isothermal processes. The user initially misapplied isothermal equations and struggled with energy calculations, believing energy conservation was violated. Key insights reveal that the internal energy of a diatomic ideal gas is calculated using U = (5/2)PV, and work done during adiabatic compression requires integration of pressure over volume changes rather than simple averages. The correct approach aligns with the first law of thermodynamics, confirming energy conservation in closed systems.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the first law of thermodynamics
  • Familiarity with ideal gas laws and properties
  • Knowledge of adiabatic vs. isothermal processes
  • Basic calculus for integrating pressure over volume
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and application of the ideal gas law for diatomic gases
  • Learn about adiabatic processes and the associated equations
  • Explore the integration of pressure in thermodynamic work calculations
  • Investigate real-world applications of gas compression and energy recovery systems
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, mechanical engineering, and thermodynamics, particularly those interested in gas compression systems and energy conservation principles.

Wazza
Messages
2
Reaction score
1
TL;DR
Trying to find the right equations which described the energy transfer when compressing a gas.
Hi there,

I am working on a home project which involves compressing a gas and then retrieving the stored energy at a later date. Obviously in a real world scenario the recovered energy will be less than the energy it takes to compress the gas, due to system losses. However as a starting point I am trying to model the idealised situation, assuming zero losses, and am having trouble making the equations stack up. I was initially misled by isothermal equations and have now learned the difference between adiabatic and isothermal. Still, when I perform the seemingly trivial calculations, energy seems to be disappearing.

It may be simplest if I describe my question using an example.

My starting point is a belief in the first law of thermodynamics : energy cannot be created nor destroyed, in a closed system it is simply transferred from one state to another.

Suppose I have chamber which is perfectly insulated and fully sealed except for an opening for a piston which seals perfectly and is frictionless.
The chamber is full of air which starts off at atmospheric pressure.
Work is done to push the piston down which compresses the air inside the chamber.
As far as I know; Work = (the transfer of) Energy.
So the increase in energy in the gas in the chamber should equal the work done to compress it. Correct me if I'm wrong.

Let's say

Chamber is 2000 litres = 2 m^3
Piston plate is 1 m^2
Piston plate moves by 500 mm = 0.5m (down, i.e. compression)
Air inside is air pressure to start with = 101325 kPa
Temperature is 25C
Air can be thought of as an ideal diatomic gas with gamma = 1.4Energy in the chamber (to start with) is pressure x volume
= 101,325 Pa x 2 m^3
= 202,650 Joules constant = pressure x volume^gamma
= 101,325 x 2^1.4
= 267,398.3Final volume
= initial volume - (piston plate area x piston plate movement)
= 1.5 m^3 Final pressure = constant / volume_end^gamma
= 267,398.3 / (1.5^1.4)
= 151,576.14Energy in the chamber (to end with) is pressure x volume
= 151,576.14 Pa x 1.5 m^3
= 227,364.2 Joules Energy increase in the gas =
227,364 - 202,650 = 24,714work done pushing the piston = average pressure x change in volume
= 1/2(P2 + P1)(V2 - V1)

= 1/2 (151,576.14 + 101,325) (2.0 - 1.5)
= 126,450.6 x 0.5
= 63,225.3 Joules

So, the work done (63,225 Joules) is much greater than the energy increase in the gas (24,714 Joules).

Where has the energy gone ??

I note that gamma of 1.4 is an empirical value for a diatomic gas. If I arbitrarily fiddle this value to be 2.044 then I can make the energy equation balance, but arbitrarily fiddling values is not good physics. What am I missing ?

Please note that this question is not about what happens in the the real world. I am trying to start by modeling an idealised situation so that I can understand the basic physics. Once I have that, I can then start introducing losses and real world considerations.

Can anybody please tell which of my calculations are incorrect and what the right calculations should be ?
 
Science news on Phys.org
Wazza said:
Energy in the chamber (to start with) is pressure x volume

No it's not. It's nCvT (for ideal gas). Also, regarding the work - average pressure need not mean arithmetic average. It is only if pressure changed linearly.
 
Wazza said:
Energy in the chamber (to start with) is pressure x volume
= 101,325 Pa x 2 m^3
= 202,650 Joules
You are considering a diatomic ideal gas, so the internal energy is
$$
U = \frac{5}{2} PV
$$

Wazza said:
work done pushing the piston = average pressure x change in volume
= 1/2(P2 + P1)(V2 - V1)

= 1/2 (151,576.14 + 101,325) (2.0 - 1.5)
= 126,450.6 x 0.5
= 63,225.3 Joules
This equation works if the pressure changes linearly, which is not true for adiabatic compression. You have to calculate
$$
W = - \int_{V_i}^{V_f} P \, dV
$$
In order to save oneself the trouble of calculating this integral, one usually actually uses the first law to calculate work along an adiabat as ##W = - \Delta U##.
 
Thank you, thank you, thank you. That has put me on the right track now and I can make the equations balance !
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
6K
Replies
14
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
6K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 61 ·
3
Replies
61
Views
7K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K