Energy seems to disappear when gas is compressed?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Wazza
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the energy dynamics involved in compressing a gas within a sealed chamber, focusing on the discrepancies observed between the work done on the gas and the energy increase calculated. Participants explore the implications of the first law of thermodynamics in an idealized scenario, distinguishing between adiabatic and isothermal processes.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes a home project involving gas compression and expresses confusion over energy calculations, noting that the work done seems greater than the energy increase in the gas.
  • Another participant challenges the initial claim that energy in the chamber can be calculated simply as pressure times volume, suggesting the use of the ideal gas internal energy formula instead.
  • A different participant points out that the work done during compression should be calculated using an integral approach rather than assuming linear pressure changes, emphasizing the need to account for adiabatic conditions.
  • The original poster acknowledges the feedback and indicates that they are now able to balance the equations, suggesting a shift in understanding based on the responses received.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the initial calculations presented. There are competing views regarding the appropriate methods for calculating energy and work in the context of gas compression, particularly concerning the assumptions made about pressure changes and the application of thermodynamic principles.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights limitations in the original calculations, particularly regarding the assumptions of linear pressure changes and the applicability of certain equations under adiabatic conditions. The need for a more nuanced understanding of thermodynamic principles is evident.

Wazza
Messages
2
Reaction score
1
TL;DR
Trying to find the right equations which described the energy transfer when compressing a gas.
Hi there,

I am working on a home project which involves compressing a gas and then retrieving the stored energy at a later date. Obviously in a real world scenario the recovered energy will be less than the energy it takes to compress the gas, due to system losses. However as a starting point I am trying to model the idealised situation, assuming zero losses, and am having trouble making the equations stack up. I was initially misled by isothermal equations and have now learned the difference between adiabatic and isothermal. Still, when I perform the seemingly trivial calculations, energy seems to be disappearing.

It may be simplest if I describe my question using an example.

My starting point is a belief in the first law of thermodynamics : energy cannot be created nor destroyed, in a closed system it is simply transferred from one state to another.

Suppose I have chamber which is perfectly insulated and fully sealed except for an opening for a piston which seals perfectly and is frictionless.
The chamber is full of air which starts off at atmospheric pressure.
Work is done to push the piston down which compresses the air inside the chamber.
As far as I know; Work = (the transfer of) Energy.
So the increase in energy in the gas in the chamber should equal the work done to compress it. Correct me if I'm wrong.

Let's say

Chamber is 2000 litres = 2 m^3
Piston plate is 1 m^2
Piston plate moves by 500 mm = 0.5m (down, i.e. compression)
Air inside is air pressure to start with = 101325 kPa
Temperature is 25C
Air can be thought of as an ideal diatomic gas with gamma = 1.4Energy in the chamber (to start with) is pressure x volume
= 101,325 Pa x 2 m^3
= 202,650 Joules constant = pressure x volume^gamma
= 101,325 x 2^1.4
= 267,398.3Final volume
= initial volume - (piston plate area x piston plate movement)
= 1.5 m^3 Final pressure = constant / volume_end^gamma
= 267,398.3 / (1.5^1.4)
= 151,576.14Energy in the chamber (to end with) is pressure x volume
= 151,576.14 Pa x 1.5 m^3
= 227,364.2 Joules Energy increase in the gas =
227,364 - 202,650 = 24,714work done pushing the piston = average pressure x change in volume
= 1/2(P2 + P1)(V2 - V1)

= 1/2 (151,576.14 + 101,325) (2.0 - 1.5)
= 126,450.6 x 0.5
= 63,225.3 Joules

So, the work done (63,225 Joules) is much greater than the energy increase in the gas (24,714 Joules).

Where has the energy gone ??

I note that gamma of 1.4 is an empirical value for a diatomic gas. If I arbitrarily fiddle this value to be 2.044 then I can make the energy equation balance, but arbitrarily fiddling values is not good physics. What am I missing ?

Please note that this question is not about what happens in the the real world. I am trying to start by modeling an idealised situation so that I can understand the basic physics. Once I have that, I can then start introducing losses and real world considerations.

Can anybody please tell which of my calculations are incorrect and what the right calculations should be ?
 
Science news on Phys.org
Wazza said:
Energy in the chamber (to start with) is pressure x volume

No it's not. It's nCvT (for ideal gas). Also, regarding the work - average pressure need not mean arithmetic average. It is only if pressure changed linearly.
 
Wazza said:
Energy in the chamber (to start with) is pressure x volume
= 101,325 Pa x 2 m^3
= 202,650 Joules
You are considering a diatomic ideal gas, so the internal energy is
$$
U = \frac{5}{2} PV
$$

Wazza said:
work done pushing the piston = average pressure x change in volume
= 1/2(P2 + P1)(V2 - V1)

= 1/2 (151,576.14 + 101,325) (2.0 - 1.5)
= 126,450.6 x 0.5
= 63,225.3 Joules
This equation works if the pressure changes linearly, which is not true for adiabatic compression. You have to calculate
$$
W = - \int_{V_i}^{V_f} P \, dV
$$
In order to save oneself the trouble of calculating this integral, one usually actually uses the first law to calculate work along an adiabat as ##W = - \Delta U##.
 
Thank you, thank you, thank you. That has put me on the right track now and I can make the equations balance !
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
6K
Replies
14
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
6K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 61 ·
3
Replies
61
Views
7K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K