BvU said:
Bhope69199 said:
I have the oscilloscope data. I cropped the data so I have one wavelength of the pulse.
Can you explain what this means ?
Did I miss the answer ?
Bhope69199 said:
Yes the pulse is very similar to your image but not exact.
Your reluctance to show the image is almost commendable.
So on the scope you almost see
Re-read post #20: ##x = \pi\ ## corresponds to t = 75 ##\mu##s, so ## a = 75 \mu s /\pi\ ## $$
10 \,\text{kV} \ \int_{-\infty}^\infty \operatorname {sinc} \left (t\over a\right ) \, dt= 0.75\,{\text Vs} $$
Bhope69199 said:
What would you like a picture of? The setup is a pulse source connected to a capacitor and the voltage drop across the capacitor is measured.
Your reluctance to show a schematic of the setup is also almost commendable.
Fortunately you dedicate a few words to it, so we can try to erverse engineer what we are talking and confusing each other about since Thursday:
Bhope69199 said:
Oscilloscope 1MΩ impedance, Scope 900MΩ impedance. Not sure of the impedance of the pulse generating device but the resistance is approx. 9kΩ.
So what is it ? 1MΩ or 900MΩ ? I hope the latter...
Now let's try to reproduce our excavations and draw the circuit:
which, according to your description, might be equivalent to
which means the capacitor discharges over the 9 k##\Omega## in about
70 ns. [edit: 0.7 ##\mu##s]
I can't for the life of me understand how the pulse generator can come up with such a weird pulse shape, but other than that it looks like we have a bad case of impedance mismatching with ringing as a consequence.
Without further context in more detail it's hard to say anything sensible about this.
##\ ##