Engine power and car acceleration

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the percentage of engine power from a Porsche 911 GT3 that contributes to its acceleration. Key calculations involve determining the power required to accelerate the car from 0 to 100 km/h in 4.3 seconds, using the car's mass and kinetic energy equations. Participants express uncertainty about the impact of various power losses, such as friction and auxiliary systems, on the total power output. The conversation highlights that without accounting for these losses, one could assume all engine power contributes to acceleration. Ultimately, the complexity of the question is acknowledged, emphasizing the need for complete data to accurately assess the power distribution.
linnus
Messages
22
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The Porsche® 911 GT3 has a 380 hp engine and a mass of 1.4×103 kg. The car can accelerate from 0 to 100 km/h in 4.3 seconds. What percentage of the power supplied by the engine goes into making the car move? Assume that the car's acceleration is constant and that there are 746 Watts/hp.


Homework Equations


p=w/t
k=1/2mv^2
a=v/t

The Attempt at a Solution



Not sure...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Power of engine in Watts?

Energy to accelerate 1.4×10^3 kg from 0 to 100 km/h?

Power to do that in 4.3 seconds?
 
What will the kinetic energy of the car be at 100 km/h?

Power is change of energy per change in time. You calculate change in energy and you are given change in time.
 
so you would do
power that it uses for it to reach its final velocity/total power right?
 
Actually its a stupid question. Or maybe a trick question.

"What percentage of the power supplied by the engine goes into making the car move?" Trivially: we have no information about losses -- services such as airco, electrical power, servo etc and frictional losses -- so must assume these are zero. A growed up question would not simply ignore those. More seriously we have no information about how much power the engine supplies, only about the max it can supply. Maybe, just maybe, it wasn't running at max power RPM with the throttle mashed into the carpet. Ignoring losses ALL the power the engine supplies goes into making it move. Where else would it go?

"An airplane crashes on the border of USA and Canada. Where do they bury the survivors?"

"Have you stopped beating your wife yet?"
 
You find the power that it took to reach that speed. Actually, you find the ENERGY it took to reach that speed, then divide it by the time it took to reach that speed to get power.

Then you divide that my the engine's power to get a fractional part.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top