Engineer and physics ,which is a right choice to me?

AI Thread Summary
A junior nuclear engineer at Texas A&M expresses a preference for theoretical physics over engineering, feeling that engineering focuses too narrowly on specific problems and lacks the depth of understanding found in physics. The individual enjoys theoretical work and excels in subjects like electromagnetism and quantum mechanics, but struggles with lab skills and prefers independent study over group projects. They are contemplating a major change to theoretical physics but are concerned about wasting their engineering coursework and the time and cost involved in pursuing both fields. Responses suggest considering a minor or double major in physics while continuing with nuclear engineering courses, emphasizing the importance of aligning career choices with personal interests. The individual plans to take advanced mechanics and electromagnetism alongside their nuclear engineering courses and is open to working as a computer programmer while studying physics independently.
tackenguyen
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
hi everyone,
i am a junior nuclear engineer at A&M. After taking engineer classes, i feel engineering only focus on specific problems, and doesn't make me understand the subject clearly and deeply as Physics does. Furthermore i like theoretical works than design reactors and so on. I am not good at lab skills ,but i am strong at theory and prove things. i like course as EM ,modern physics and quantum than heat tranfer or fluid mechanic. I like working on my own theory than work in a large group of engineer. If i change my major to theoretical physics now, i will waste all my engineer classes. I can't study both NE and physics because i cost me too much money and time (at least 2.5 years). Please advice me what would i do. Do what i like or keep studying NE which i may like in future. Thank you very much.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Depends on your objective

Are you looking for high salary or a life of 'doing what you love'?

You can always minor or double major even though that takes a while to complete hte courses but hey, its cool and helpful.
 
Physics might look all nice and dandy in theory, but once you want it to work you usually turn to engineering - because there is more to it than 'just theory'. So with this in mind, you should simply take additional courses in Physics (Modern Physics, EM Waves, Analytical Mechanics, Quantum Mechanics, etc)

Some of those courses will be cleverly hidden under Chemistry, EE, and ME classes - read the descriptions and prerequisites and take them in addition to nuclear engineering. If you still 'love to do it' - go to grad school for either Engineering Physics or something more particular (Applied Physics or even pure Physics)
 
Pengwuino said:
Depends on your objective

Are you looking for high salary or a life of 'doing what you love'?

You can always minor or double major even though that takes a while to complete hte courses but hey, its cool and helpful.

What if being an engineer is "doing what you love"?
 
Thanks a lot,
i will take advanced mechanic and EM in fall beside my NUEN 401,409. Once again ,salary is not a problem to me but "doing what i love" is my main thing in life. Somehow i wil work as a computer programmer and then study physics on my own.
 
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...
Back
Top