Enhancing My VDG: Can I Get Better Power?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ExStorm1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Power
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on improving the performance of a Van de Graaff generator (VDG) that is currently underperforming, producing only 0.25 to 0.5 inches of spark. Suggestions include using a static control brush for the lower comb and experimenting with different materials for the belt, such as Teflon or silicone, while avoiding asbestos due to safety concerns. Participants also discuss the importance of the rubbing block material and suggest alternatives like glass for better static charge generation. There are mentions of practical experiments that can be conducted with the VDG once its power is enhanced, such as lighting a Bunsen burner or levitating tin foil cups. Overall, the conversation highlights the need for better materials and configurations to achieve desired results with the VDG.
ExStorm1
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I built a VDG a few days ago and I was kind of saddened by it's lack of power. anything I can do to make it better?

i was thinking to use a static control brush for the lower comb, and I might try a sphere of copper for the receptacle

i don't know if my goal is viable, ut I want it to be able to raise my ~2in. hair
and maybe a few other experiments like the classic bbubble experiment

it creates about a .25-.5 in. spark at longest, and I don't know where I can get a better belt (I am currently using 'natural' spandex), how thick and what material should it be?

any suggestions?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If my experience is any indication, you should toss a couple of cats in there. I've gotten 3" sparks off of Lucy. :eek:
 
haha, but i don't have any cats :(
 
Hmm... that do present a problem. Seriously, I would suggest doing what I was going to do on your behalf and link you to. Use your Google to find what sort of static-production characteristics various materials have, particularly in regard to interactions between them. I'm going to go ahead and look into it myself, but you'll probably beat me to the answers. My first Google request will be: static electricity production materials
 
Okay, here's something.
http://www.simco.nl/info/about-simco/about-static/"

It would appear from this, if I'm interpreting it correctly, that the best combination of substances for your machine would be a Teflon belt with an asbestos comb, followed by a silicone belt/glass comb set.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I thought that the combs only had to be conductive, with the rollers opposite in the Triboelectric series, with the belt neutral...plus, is asbestos even conducive?
 
Sorry... a slip of the keyboard there. I didn't mean the comb; I meant the pad or block or whatever you are rubbing your belt on to cause the static build-up. The comb should be metallic.
 
ok, so i have a nylon top roller and a silicone rubber bottom rollser with a spandex belt, i want to replace the belt... what can I use?
 
What the hell does this mean?

Error!

Error. Reason: Segment "about-static" was not a keyword for a postVarSet as expected!

It popped up just now when I tried to use my own link.

Anyhow, I might have the wrong idea about how your generator works. The ones that I've seen had some sort of rubbing block that the belt scraped as it was turning, and the comb pulled the charge off of the belt and into the ball. The composition of the rollers wasn't an issue. With a Spandex belt, it would appear that your rubbing block should be asbestos or glass. Maybe someone else should get involved here, because I'm not sure that we're talking about the same kind of machine.
 
  • #10
i wouldn't use asbestos -- rubbing it could be bad.

http://amasci.com/emotor/vdg.html

Be careful about the size you build. If you are not careful with a machine like this, you can get hurt/burned/etc.
 
  • #11
Good point about the asbestos, wx. And that's a great link. The machine there seems to be just like Ex-Storm's, and is indeed different than the one that I saw years ago.
In this case, I'd keep the silicone roller and replace the other one with glass. I don't know how easy it would be to get ahold of a glass rod big enough, but maybe a nice smooth wine bottle with the ends cut off could work.
 
  • #12
whoa, glass? that's hard to handle
 
  • #13
well easiest way is to check for better materials for rubbing, and maybe getting a faster motor, or just load more current on the current motor...

by the way, this site linked up there, is awesome, heh, i made a pendulum go crazy with an idea from that site, by using the electric field on a crt screen...
 
  • #14
ExStorm1 said:
whoa, glass? that's hard to handle
Not if you have a glass cylinder and use it as a sleeve over a wooden dowel with an axle.
 
  • #15
Wonder how hard it'd be to make one out of a treadmill...

moo
__________________
moo (moo') adj. Of no practical importance; irrelevant, such as a moo point (i.e. a cow's opinion).
 
  • #16
It's not really a matter of how hard it would be, so much as how can you get enough hamsters running in the same direction... :rolleyes:
 
  • #17
Danger said:
Not if you have a glass cylinder and use it as a sleeve over a wooden dowel with an axle.

you just need to find a fuse, and wear off the two metal caps from both sides, and there you have a glass cylinder.
 
Last edited:
  • #18
Isn't there a scaling problem there?
 
  • #19
Simple idea

Sounds a bit simplistic, but I was on the Van de Graff for my school's open evening and it got so much better through the night as we put a powerful lamp right next 2 the belt to make it bone dry. But u've probably already thought of that.

A cool thing 2 do with it once its working btw, is 2 light a bunsen burner with ur finger, making sure u Earth the bunsen and insulate urself. Also piling tin foil cups on top so they fly away.
 
  • #20
It's not really a matter of how hard it would be, so much as how can you get enough hamsters running in the same direction...
Lol, I figure a cat tied to one end should do it... :biggrin:

moo
__________________
moo (moo') adj. Of no practical importance; irrelevant, such as a moo point (i.e. a cow's opinion).
 
  • #21
Well, now... you're starting to think like me. Perhaps therapy is in order.
 
Back
Top