Entangled particles and measurement

JK423
Gold Member
Messages
394
Reaction score
7
We know that if, for example, two particles are entangled in a state like: |Ψ>=a |0>|0> + b |1>|1>, then measuring an observable on only one of the particles it makes the interference dissapear.
But isn't it impossible to measure both particles simultaneously in order to maintain the interference?? There should be an infinitsimal time difference!
That leads me to the conclusion that if two particles get entangled then no interferences will ever appear. Would you agree?

Also, the above can explain for example why in the double slit experiment interference is lost when we try to specify the electron`s position (which slit). When the photon scatters from the electron, their interaction makes them somehow get entangled. So, when the electron hit the wall (position measurement) the interference is lost just because it`s entangled to the photon that scattered!
If the scattered photon is detected first (measurement), then its' state collapses and so does the electron`s. That means, no interference again.
Is the above description any close to reality?

And one last question! I mentioned above that in the photon-electron scattering the particles somehow get entangled. In general, when particles interact with each other, they get entangled??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
JK423 said:
We know that if, for example, two particles are entangled in a state like: |Ψ>=a |0>|0> + b |1>|1>, then measuring an observable on only one of the particles it makes the interference dissapear.
But isn't it impossible to measure both particles simultaneously in order to maintain the interference?? There should be an infinitsimal time difference!
That leads me to the conclusion that if two particles get entangled then no interferences will ever appear. Would you agree?

A couple of points. First, interference disappears for entangled photons if the possibility merely exists to determine which-slit information. It only "returns" (this is a bit too complex to get into in a paragraph) if you erase that possibility. Second, as you suggest, there is a time difference when measuring Alice and Bob pretty much no matter how you set things up.

So essentially, your conclusion is correct. Groups of entangled photons NEVER show an interference pattern directly.
 
Thanks a lot DrChinese!
If there are any other comments on the rest of the OP, they`d be welcome!
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
According to recent podcast between Jacob Barandes and Sean Carroll, Barandes claims that putting a sensitive qubit near one of the slits of a double slit interference experiment is sufficient to break the interference pattern. Here are his words from the official transcript: Is that true? Caveats I see: The qubit is a quantum object, so if the particle was in a superposition of up and down, the qubit can be in a superposition too. Measuring the qubit in an orthogonal direction might...

Similar threads

Replies
23
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
226
Replies
19
Views
2K
Back
Top