Entanglement Between Different Types of Particles?

LarryS
Gold Member
Messages
357
Reaction score
33
From what I have read so far, it seems as though entanglement can only exist between particles of the same type (2 photons, 2 electrons, etc.) - that their Hilbert spaces must be compatible and of the same dimension.

Is that correct?

As always, thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
All entanglement experiments were performed with identical particles. But you may (theoretically) entangle parameters of different particles. I see no reason why, e.g., spins of electron and proton should not be entangled.
 
And I think positrons/electrons are a common topic for entanglement gedankenexperiments, like the Greene version of the EPR paradox (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EPR_paradox). In a way its cleaner-- identical particles exhibit a second form of "entanglement" that has to do with their indistinguishability, gives us the Pauli exclusion principle (for fermions), and is a bit different from what people usually mean by quantum entanglement.
 
referframe said:
From what I have read so far, it seems as though entanglement can only exist between particles of the same type (2 photons, 2 electrons, etc.) - that their Hilbert spaces must be compatible and of the same dimension.
What do you mean by "compatible" Hilbert spaces? Mathematically, a composite quantum system with Hilbert spaces H1 and H2 is described by the tensor product H1⊗H2 which does not require the spaces to be of the same dimension. For example, the spatial Hilbert space of a free electron has the dimension infinity while its spin Hilbert space has the dimension 2.

Entangled two-particle-states typically look like |a1>⊗|b1> + |a2>⊗|b2>. The important property here is that when particle a is in state |a1>, particle b is in state |b1> with certainty. Not that the states |a> and |b> live in the same Hilbert space.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top