Insights Entanglement Entropy – Part 2: Quantum Field Theory - Comments

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the application of entanglement entropy in quantum field theory, specifically highlighting the formula S = c/3 log(ℓ/a), which is valid for (1+1)-dimensional conformal field theories (CFTs) with a conformal anomaly represented by a constant c. For higher dimensions, the concept of "twist fields" as nonlocal operators complicates the analysis, requiring additional work. Research by Casini and Huerta has explored free fields and established connections between entanglement entropy and Euclidean free energy in (2+1)-dimensional CFTs. The Calabrese-Cardy replica trick provides some insights into certain CFTs, but comprehensive results for strongly-interacting CFTs remain limited. Overall, the article emphasizes the complexity of entanglement entropy in various dimensions of quantum field theory.
ShayanJ
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
2,801
Reaction score
606
ShayanJ submitted a new PF Insights post

Entanglement Entropy – Part 2: Quantum Field Theory
entanglement_entropy2.png


Continue reading the Original PF Insights Post.
 
  • Like
Likes atyy and Greg Bernhardt
Physics news on Phys.org
The result

S = \frac{c}{3} \log \frac{\ell}{a}

only applies to (1+1)-d CFTs, where the conformal anomaly exists and is parametrized by a single constant c. For higher dimensions, the "twist fields" are nonlocal "line" operators and you need to do some work. Free fields have been studied by Casini and Huerta ( ttps://arxiv.org/abs/0905.2562), and AdS/CFT gives some results from holography. Casini and Huerta have also shown that the entanglement entropy of a circle in a (2+1)-d CFT is equal to the Euclidean free energy on the sphere (see the Hartman lectures you asked about in another recent thread), and there are isolated results for certain CFTs which can be perturbatively accessed using this Calabrese-Cardy replica trick you describe. But general results for general regions in strongly-interacting CFTs are rare.
 
king vitamin said:
The result

S = \frac{c}{3} \log \frac{\ell}{a}

only applies to (1+1)-d CFTs, where the conformal anomaly exists and is parametrized by a single constant c. For higher dimensions, the "twist fields" are nonlocal "line" operators and you need to do some work. Free fields have been studied by Casini and Huerta ( ttps://arxiv.org/abs/0905.2562), and AdS/CFT gives some results from holography. Casini and Huerta have also shown that the entanglement entropy of a circle in a (2+1)-d CFT is equal to the Euclidean free energy on the sphere (see the Hartman lectures you asked about in another recent thread), and there are isolated results for certain CFTs which can be perturbatively accessed using this Calabrese-Cardy replica trick you describe. But general results for general regions in strongly-interacting CFTs are rare.

Of course, I just forgot to make it clear that I'm working in 1+1 dimensions. But I think the figures and some parts of the calculation make it clear.
 
I am slowly going through the book 'What Is a Quantum Field Theory?' by Michel Talagrand. I came across the following quote: One does not" prove” the basic principles of Quantum Mechanics. The ultimate test for a model is the agreement of its predictions with experiments. Although it may seem trite, it does fit in with my modelling view of QM. The more I think about it, the more I believe it could be saying something quite profound. For example, precisely what is the justification of...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
7K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 82 ·
3
Replies
82
Views
10K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K