Why Is Entropy Defined as the Logarithm of Multiplicity in Thermodynamics?

aaaa202
Messages
1,144
Reaction score
2
Entropy is in my book defined as:

S = k ln\Omega , where \Omega is the multiplicity of the microstates.

Now I have several questions regarding this definition (please try to answer them all! :) )

1) Why do you take the log of the multiplicity? Is it just because additivity as well as the fact that even for a lot of particles S is still a small number, just makes it a lot more convenient to work with this definition?
At first I thought so, but then ln increases less per step the farther you are on the x axis. So wouldn't that make problems?

2) I can understand that generally thermodynamics is more deeply described in statistical mechanics. Is entropy then on a deeper level still defined as the the above, or is that just something that also appears to be true? I'm asking this because, the k factor seems to indicate, that there's more to it than at first glance.
Also I have seen a few videos, which discuss entropy in information theory, and here it seems that entropy is something more deep than just an expression for the multiplicity of a system.

That covers all. Thanks :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
(1) As you already said , the natural log grantees the additive property which is anticipated for an extensive quantity such as entropy. However, more generally you can define the entropy for any probability distribution function. In the microcanonical ensemble (Fixed, N,V,E) , the probability of any state of energy E is just 1/Ω (E). For this PDF , S has to be lnΩ. The extra factor of kB was added to match the thermodynamic dimensions of entropy (energy unit/degree kelvin).

(2) Up to a constant , the thermodynamic entropy, Shanon entropy (information theory), statistical mechanics entropy, and H in Boltzmann H-theorem are equivalent.
In statistical mechanics, the entropy in the microcanonical ensemble is given by the expression you wrote.
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top