Is Entropy in Non-Scientific Contexts Subjective?

  • Thread starter Thread starter DaveC426913
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Entropy
AI Thread Summary
Entropy can be applied beyond thermodynamics, such as in measuring the order of a deck of cards, where a sorted deck represents the lowest entropy state. However, the concept of order in this context is arbitrary, as one can define different properties of interest, such as weight, to alter the perceived entropy. This raises the question of whether entropy is inherently subjective based on the chosen criteria for order. Entropy is fundamentally a property of thermodynamic macrostates, which are defined by variables like pressure and temperature, rather than individual microstates. Thus, while entropy can be discussed in non-scientific contexts, its application remains complex and potentially subjective.
DaveC426913
Gold Member
Messages
23,884
Reaction score
7,914
So I get into these discussions on other ... less scientific ... fora, and then run into trouble and have to come here for correct answers.

I state these as assumptions but they are really questions. Please correct.
  • Entropy is usually applied in a thermodynamics context, but it can be applied to any other source of order just as easily.
  • A deck of cards can have its entropy measured.
  • A fresh, sorted deck of cards has the lowest entropy possible, as it is in the highest ordered state possible.
But:
  • The "order" of a deck of cards is entirely arbitrary. There's nothing objective about sequential human symbols.
  • I could just as arbitrarily decide that the property of interest isn't sequential printed numbers, rather - I don't know - weight. The deck of cards is at its lowest entropic state when they are sorted heaviest card (most ink) to lightest card.
  • I could even leave the property of interest the same and arbitrarily decide what is ordered and what is not:
    • I start with a sequential deck of cards. I decide they are ordered.
    • I shuffle them, and measure the disorder.
    • I then declare the new state to be perfectly ordered, and shuffle again.
So, either entropy is dependent on the property (or properties) of interest (and therefore subjective) or I am misapplying the concept of entropy.
 
Science news on Phys.org
Entropy isn't really a property of a single microstate, e.g. a way of ordering a deck of cards, or a combination of particle position and momenta in a classical point particle ideal gas. It's a property of a thermodynamical macrostate, like a combination of variables ##P,V,n,T## of an ideal gas, and it gets larger when there is a greater number of microstates that are consistent with that apparent macroscopic state.

It's a bit difficult to define "macroscopic" variables for a deck of cards, but you could for instance sum the number of red cards in the deck that have a black card both before and after them to obtain a variable that is some kind of average over the microstate variables.
 
  • Like
Likes nasu, jim mcnamara, Dale and 1 other person
Shuffled Cards, Messy Desks, and Disorderly Dorm Rooms — Examples of Entropy Increase? Nonsense!
by F. L. Lambert
http://entropysite.oxy.edu/shuffled_cards.html#c1
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes DaveC426913, Klystron and DrClaude
Back
Top