Entropy, Relative entropy, Mutual information

atyy
Science Advisor
Messages
15,170
Reaction score
3,379
The Bekenstein-Hawking entropy is expected to be, and has been shown to be in some cases, derived from counting states.

However, entropy is not defined for continuous probability densities, and so I have heard it said that relative entropy (of which the mutual information is a form) is more fundamental.

I think in classical statistical mechanics, the entropy is computed using canonical coordinates, since the phase space is continuous, which is one way to get round the need for discrete probability distributions.

In the context of string theory and quantum gravity, is entropy or the relative entropy more fundamental?Some possibly related comments:
"the mutual information offers a more refined probe of the entanglement structure of quantum field theories because it remains finite in the continuum limit" http://arxiv.org/abs/1010.4038
 
I seem to notice a buildup of papers like this: Detecting single gravitons with quantum sensing. (OK, old one.) Toward graviton detection via photon-graviton quantum state conversion Is this akin to “we’re soon gonna put string theory to the test”, or are these legit? Mind, I’m not expecting anyone to read the papers and explain them to me, but if one of you educated people already have an opinion I’d like to hear it. If not please ignore me. EDIT: I strongly suspect it’s bunk but...
I'm trying to understand the relationship between the Higgs mechanism and the concept of inertia. The Higgs field gives fundamental particles their rest mass, but it doesn't seem to directly explain why a massive object resists acceleration (inertia). My question is: How does the Standard Model account for inertia? Is it simply taken as a given property of mass, or is there a deeper connection to the vacuum structure? Furthermore, how does the Higgs mechanism relate to broader concepts like...
Back
Top