Epodea plant cells the chloroplasts 'retreated'

  • Thread starter Thread starter nobahar
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cells Plant
AI Thread Summary
In a practical observation of Epodea plant cells using light microscopes, chloroplasts were noted to retreat to the cell edges, with vacuoles not significantly large enough to push them. The chloroplasts appeared to circle the cell, with varying directions among different cells. The original poster questioned whether these structures were indeed chloroplasts or possibly other organisms. A provided link offered additional information relevant to the inquiry. The discussion highlights the need for further clarification on chloroplast behavior in plant cells.
nobahar
Messages
482
Reaction score
2
Hello!
I performed a quick practical today using light microscopes. When looking at Epodea plant cells the chloroplasts 'retreated' to the edge of the cell; the vacuoles weren't particularly large and so didn't appear to be 'pushing' the chloroplasts an awful lot. Also, the chloroplasts at the egde seemed to 'circle' the cell (the direction differed amongst cells). Can someone explain the choroplasts behaviour? Is it possible that they were just other 'organisms' (the question in th epractical seemed to imply that they were chloroplasts)? Any response would be appreciated.
Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
http://jeb.biologists.org/cgi/content/full/206/12/1963
 


Thanks for the link, that's just what I was looking for!
Much appreciated; and there's plenty to read... :smile:
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'

Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'

TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
View full post »

Thread 'Prove that evolution is constant (Provide at least two arguments to support your position)'

I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
View full post »

Similar threads

Appl. Phys: I love everything about her.... but her Math(s)
Replies
2
Views
2K
How Do Various Theories Define Information Through Entropy?
Replies
13
Views
10K
The Truth about 911 gutting the disinformation, LETS GET IT ON
3
Replies
109
Views
63K
Newb vs Noob Guide: Understanding the Difference and How to Avoid Them
Replies
22
Views
24K
Mathematica This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 266)
Replies
1
Views
3K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top