Eqilibrium between ice and water

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter chound
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ice Water
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the effects of increased pressure on the equilibrium between ice and water, exploring thermodynamic principles and the implications for phase transitions. Participants examine how pressure influences the state of the system, considering both theoretical and practical aspects.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that increasing pressure on ice at equilibrium with water causes the equilibrium to shift towards the water phase due to the lower density of ice compared to water.
  • Others argue that the relationship between pressure and volume is complex, suggesting that increasing pressure should lead to a decrease in volume, which may influence the phase distribution.
  • A participant notes that if water and ice are treated as incompressible, increased pressure might not decrease their volumes, but could lead to an increase in temperature, potentially causing some ice to melt.
  • Another participant challenges the idea that increased pressure always results in heat, clarifying that work done by pressure on a shrinking volume can lead to latent heat, facilitating the melting of ice.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the effects of pressure on the equilibrium between ice and water, with no consensus reached on the mechanisms involved or the implications of increased pressure.

Contextual Notes

Some assumptions about the incompressibility of ice and water, as well as the specific relationships between pressure, volume, and temperature, remain unresolved and are subject to interpretation.

chound
Messages
163
Reaction score
0
When ice is @ eqilibrium with water, the pressure is increased, what happens to the eqilibrium?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not an expert in this area, but I do know that when you apply pressure to ice, it will begin to liquify. This is the physics behind most winter sports - from skating to curling.
 
Last edited:
chound said:
When ice is @ eqilibrium with water, the pressure is increased, what happens to the eqilibrium?

It shifts towards the water, and that is because the density of ice is smaller than the density of water (which is quite an exceptional feat : most materials are denser in their solid phase than in their liquid phase).

It is a consequence of a general law of thermodynamical equilibrium (which you can derive more formally, but I cannot recall its derivation off the top of my head): "any action on a system in equilibrium will shift its point of equilibrium in such a way as to oppose the change you want to apply"

So, when you increase pressure, the system can try to relieve pressure by shrinking in volume (hence shifting towards the most dense phase).
 
vanesch said:
It shifts towards the water, and that is because the density of ice is smaller than the density of water (which is quite an exceptional feat : most materials are denser in their solid phase than in their liquid phase).
It is a consequence of a general law of thermodynamical equilibrium (which you can derive more formally, but I cannot recall its derivation off the top of my head): "any action on a system in equilibrium will shift its point of equilibrium in such a way as to oppose the change you want to apply"
So, when you increase pressure, the system can try to relieve pressure by shrinking in volume (hence shifting towards the most dense phase).
I thought pressure was inversely propotional to volume. So if u increase pressure volume should also increase to decrease the pressure
 
chound said:
I thought pressure was inversely propotional to volume. So if u increase pressure volume should also increase to decrease the pressure

Eh, your remark makes me see how badly I formulated my proposition.

Imagine you have 2 phases F1 and F2, and imagine that the specific volume of phase F1, as a function of pressure p, is v1(p), and the specific volume of phase F2 is v2(p) ; now, assume that v1(p) is much smaller than v2(p).

The total volume of the system is V = N1 v1(p) + N2 v2(p) for a given distribution of the substance over the two phases N1 in phase F1 and N2 in phase N2, which happens to be a certain equilibrium point.

Now, when pressure is increased from p to p', one can show that in general, N1 will increase, and N2 will decrease, so that the phase with the smallest specific volume will gain in importance, hence lowering the overall volume MORE than if N1 and N2 remained constant. As such, the pressure needed to put the system in volume V' (with the changing N1 and N2), is LESS than the pressure that is needed to put the system in volume V' WITHOUT shifting the equilibrium. So it is loosely said that the increase in pressure is "resisted" by the system by shifting its own degree of freedom (the point of equilibrium N1/N2). So the shifting equilibrium will 'give in more' than you would expect if the ratios remained constant (if the equilibrium would not shift).
 
If you assume water and ice are both incompressible, pressure will not decrease the volume of either. In general, extra pressure means extra heat (like putting air in a tire) so you might argue that the temperature of the mix will increase and that would cause some ice to melt. You could also argue that water is denser, so increased pressure will compress the ice more...that would also tend to increase the temperature of the ice, so either way it looks like ice loses!
 
Robine said:
If you assume water and ice are both incompressible, pressure will not decrease the volume of either. In general, extra pressure means extra heat (like putting air in a tire)

No, pressure does not always mean heat ; the "heat" comes from the work done by the pressure on the schrinking volume. If the volume doesn't change, then increasing the pressure does not do work. But in fact, it is the shifting in equilibrium from the ice to the water phase, which allows for some work to be done by the pressure (because of the decrease in volume, remember that water takes less volume than ice), and THIS work (the pressure times the decrease in volume) IS indeed converted into (latent) heat, to allow for a bit of the ice to melt (and to shift the equilibrium in the first place).

But that was maybe what you wanted to say too:shy:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
16K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K