Equation and write the procedure? x+cos(x)=0

  • Thread starter Thread starter BC-02
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Procedure
BC-02
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Can someone solve this equation and write the procedure?

x+cos(x)=0

Without using graph.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
cos(x) is a transcendental function, there isn't much point to scratching your head trying to solve a transcendental equation; it isn't likely to be expressible in terms of radicals anyway.

Use Newtons method.
 
The approximate solution is all u could get...The solution is unique,however,it is certainly a transcendental (i.e.no algebraic) number...

Daniel.
 
cos(x)=0,3 is also transcendental equation (I think), even so I can get approximate solution with my calculator (1,266 ...). Is there any possibility how to get approximate solution of x+cos(x)=0 with common calculator (for example the calculator in windows)?
 
Express the equation as:

x = - Cos(x)

now do a fixed point iteration so

x_2 = - \cos (x_1)
and
x_{n +1} = - \cos (x_n)


Start by making a guess between 1 and 0, call this x_1 calculate x_2 ,simply repeat the process until the number stops changing. It is not incredibly fast, 20 iterations gets you around 3 digits. Keep iterating until you are tired of pushing buttons, observe the digits that do not change. The unchanging digits are your answer. If you want more digits iterate some more.
 
Thank you, I think this is sufficient for me.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top