Equation linking superstring vibration with mass?

In summary, there are equations that link the vibration of a superstring filament to the mass of resultant particles, similar to the formula for the bosonic string. However, understanding these equations requires a thorough understanding of worldsheet conformal field theory and may not be useful for explaining the masses of observed particles. Additionally, explaining these equations would require a significant amount of time, as they involve complex symbols and concepts.
  • #1
R. E. Nettleton
9
0
Is there an existing equation, or set of equations, that directly links the specific vibration of a superstring filament with the resultant particle mass?

A brief explanation of any mathematics would be helpful. Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
You are probably thinking of an analogue to the formula for the bosonic string
$$ M^2 = \frac{4}{\alpha'} (N-1),$$
where ##N## is the oscillator level and ##1/(2\pi \alpha')## is the string tension. There are related formulas for the superstrings, but you really need to understand the worldsheet conformal field theory to understand where they come from. I couldn't give a brief explanation of it, but the lectures by Tong are extremely clear. The bosonic formula is arrived at the end of Ch. 1 and further developed in Ch. 2. For the superstring formulas, the book by Zweibach is probably the gentlest reference.

Also, the fact that ##1/\sqrt{\alpha'}## is usually of order of the Planck mass means that the massive states corresponding to higher vibration states have nothing to do with the elementary particles that we measure. The observed particles must come from the massless, lowest-level string states and acquire masses via some version of the Higgs mechanism at energies much lower than the string scale. So the formula above isn't very useful for phenomenology and you really have to understand how the fermion modes in the CFT are used to construct states.

I can't think of a way to give a brief explanation of this, since the explanation of the symbols that would appear in the equations would take several weeks of lectures in a string theory course..
 

1. What is the equation that links superstring vibration with mass?

The equation that links superstring vibration with mass is known as the mass formula or the Beale-Kato-Majumdar-Sen (BKMS) formula. It is given by: m = √(n^2 + (p/R)^2), where m is the mass of the string, n is the number of nodes in the string's vibration, p is the string's momentum, and R is the string's radius.

2. How does this equation relate to superstring theory?

This equation is derived from superstring theory, which is a theoretical framework in physics that attempts to explain the fundamental nature of all particles and forces in the universe. In this theory, particles are described as tiny, vibrating strings and the mass formula helps to quantify the relationship between the string's vibration and its mass.

3. Are there any limitations to this equation?

Yes, there are some limitations to this equation. It is only applicable to closed strings, which are loops that have no endpoints. It also does not take into account the effects of quantum mechanics, which may influence the properties of strings at the subatomic level.

4. Can this equation be used to predict the mass of any particle?

No, this equation is specifically designed for superstring particles. It cannot be used to predict the mass of any other type of particle, such as subatomic particles like electrons or protons.

5. How is this equation relevant to current scientific research?

This equation is still a subject of ongoing research and study in the field of theoretical physics. It helps to support the fundamental principles of superstring theory and has potential applications in fields such as quantum gravity and cosmology. Researchers are also exploring ways to test and verify the predictions of this equation through experiments and observations.

Similar threads

  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
26
Views
678
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
47
Views
4K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
5
Views
3K
Back
Top