Equation of motion for a chain sliding down an edge

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on deriving the equation of motion for a chain of length l partially hanging off a table, with a segment x0 hanging down. Key points include the conservation of mechanical energy, neglecting friction, and assuming constant density. The vertical segment of the chain is expected to increase in length exponentially over time as it slides off the table. The total length of the chain remains constant, and the kinetic and potential energies of the chain's segments combine linearly. The conversation emphasizes setting up the conservation of energy equation and differentiating it to find the motion dynamics.
smayorgat
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I studied physics a long time ago and somebody just asked me this question. After trying for a while I couldn't work it out.

The situation is this: there's a chain of length $l$ on a table, of which a portion, of length $x_0$, is hanging out (enough so that when you stop holding it down, the chain starts sliding). Like in this drawing:

[PLAIN]http://b.imagehost.org/0596/chain.jpg

Friction is neglected.

How do you set up the differential equation of motion for the chain?

Thank you very much.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
1. Remember that neither internal forces nor normal forces do any work on the chain.
That is: mechanical energy is conserved.

2. Assume that the vertical part of the chain never swings

3. Remember that the total length of of the chain remains the same.

4. Assume constant density.

5. For simplification, set the 0-level for the gravitational potential at the table surface.

6. Remember that kinetic&potential energies for different parts of the chain add together linearly.

7. Set up the equation of conservation of mechanical energy, differentiate that equation.

8. Hint: The vertical line segment should increase exponentially in length as a function of time, as long as there is still some horizontal segment moving on the table.
 
smayorgat said:
The situation is this: there's a chain of length $l$ on a table, of which a portion, of length $x_0$, is hanging out (enough so that when you stop holding it down, the chain starts sliding).

Friction is neglected.

A Google search with the terms "chain", "table" and "sliding" had as 3rd entry the following PDF-document:
https://wiki.brown.edu/confluence/download/attachments/2752884/Chain.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1198253619000"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top