Equation of motion for a rigid rotating rod

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves deriving the equation of motion for a rigid rod of mass M rotating around a pivot point at one end, with a length L, using the Lagrangian formalism. The original poster questions whether the rod can be treated as a simple pendulum with an equivalent bob mass.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the analogy of the rod to a pendulum, with some suggesting it should be treated as a compound pendulum. The role of the center of mass and the moment of inertia in the kinetic energy calculations is explored. There are questions about how to incorporate the kinetic energy of an additional bead attached to the rod.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing hints and guidance on the correct approach to kinetic energy calculations. There is an ongoing exploration of the equations of motion, with some participants clarifying misunderstandings about the contributions of different components to the kinetic energy.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the complexities of rotational dynamics and the implications of adding a moving mass to the system. There is a focus on ensuring that the kinetic energy terms are correctly formulated without double counting contributions.

Cole.
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

Homework Statement


My problem is a pretty basic one, in a exercise a rigid rod of mass M is rotating around a horizontal pivot point i one end. The rod has the length L. I now need to derive the equation of motion using the Lagrangian formalism.

My question is:
Can i view the rod as a pendulum with a bob mass equal to that of the rod?


In this case the equation would simply be:
[itex]\theta '' + \sqrt{\dfrac{g}{L}} sin(\theta)=0[/itex]

Best Regards
Cole.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Cole. said:
My question is:
Can i view the rod as a pendulum with a bob mass equal to that of the rod?
Not exactly. An extended mass such as a rod cannot be treated as a simple pendulum. Treat it as a physical (or compound) pendulum.
 
Ach thanks your reference to compound pendulum got me on the right track.
It's all about the center of mass:
[itex]I \theta '' = -M_{cm} g L_{cm} sin \theta<br /> \Leftrightarrow \theta '' = -\dfrac{3 g}{2 L} sin (\theta)[/itex]
 
Good. Now do it using the Lagrangian. :smile:
 
Thanks for the quick reply, I am slightly confused as how to in corporate the moment of inertia for the rod. If I use the kinetic energy [itex]T=\dfrac{1}{2}M r'^{2}[/itex] and potential energy [itex]U=-mg r \mathrm{cos} \theta[/itex] there is no difference from the regular pendulum and i don't get the 3/2 factor!
Could I use [itex]T=\dfrac{1}{2} I r'^{2}[/itex] where I is the inertia? A hint is appreciated :)

Regards
Cole.
 
You must use the rotational KE = 1/2Iω2, not 1/2Mv^2. (You'll express in terms of θ', of course.)
 
Great i figured it out!
However I have run into a new problem. Suppose the rod has a bead of mass m attached at the pivot moving down is it rotates. I can't figure out what the kinetic energy of the system is.. Me guess is [itex]T_{tot}=T_{rod}+T_{bead}=\dfrac{1}{2}\dot{\theta}^{2}\left( I_{rod}+I_{bead}\right) + \dfrac{1}{2}m\left( \dot{r}+r\dot{\theta}\right) ^2[/itex] because the bead must contribute with kinetic energy from the radial speed. ([itex]\bar{v}=v_{r}+v_{\theta}=\dot{r}+r\dot{\theta}[/itex]) However my equations of motion don't seem right.. Any hints? You've been more than helpful so far!

Regards
Cole.
 
The KE of the rod is the same. Careful how you write the KE of the bead: Don't count it twice and don't add perpendicular velocity components together before squaring them.
 
Everything appears correct except for the velocity factor. When I expand it I get:
[itex]\dfrac{1}{2}m\ddot{r}^{2}+m\dot{r}r\dot{\theta}+ \dfrac{1}{2} mr^{2}\dot{\theta}^{2}[/itex]
and when I use the part of the Legrender equation relevant for the energy I get:
[itex]\dfrac{\mathrm{d}}{\mathrm{t}}\dfrac{\mathrm{d}L}{\mathrm{d}\dot{\theta}}=m\dot{r}r\ddot{\theta} +m r^{2}\ddot{\theta}[/itex]
I have deduced from another solution that the above result should simply be: [itex]2mr \dot{r} \dot{\theta}[/itex]
Where am I going wrong?
Thanks a million for the help!

Regards
Cole.
 
  • #10
Cole. said:
Everything appears correct except for the velocity factor. When I expand it I get:
[itex]\dfrac{1}{2}m\ddot{r}^{2}+m\dot{r}r\dot{\theta}+ \dfrac{1}{2} mr^{2}\dot{\theta}^{2}[/itex]
What did you expand to get this? If you are referring to the last term in the following, I'd say it was wrong:
Cole. said:
Me guess is [itex]T_{tot}=T_{rod}+T_{bead}=\dfrac{1}{2}\dot{\theta}^{2}\left( I_{rod}+I_{bead}\right) + \dfrac{1}{2}m\left( \dot{r}+r\dot{\theta}\right) ^2[/itex]
Reread my last post.
 
  • #11
Yes I am referring to the last term:
[itex]\dfrac{1}{2}m( \dot{r}+r \dot{\theta} )^{2}=\dfrac{1}{2}m(\dot{r}^{2}+2r\dot{r} \dot{\theta}+r^{2}\theta ^{2})[/itex]
What i think you mean in the above is to say:
[itex]T_{b}=\dfrac{1}{2}I_{b}\dot{\theta}+\dfrac{1}{2}m \dot{r} ^{2}+\dfrac{1}{2}mr^{2} \dot{\theta}^{2}[/itex]
but that doesn't either give me the expression I'm looking for..
 
  • #12
Cole. said:
What i think you mean in the above is to say:
[itex]T_{b}=\dfrac{1}{2}I_{b}\dot{\theta}+\dfrac{1}{2}m \dot{r} ^{2}+\dfrac{1}{2}mr^{2} \dot{\theta}^{2}[/itex]
Yes, that's what I would put as the KE term. Except that Ib should be Irod in the first term. And the [itex]\dot{\theta}[/itex] should be squared.
but that doesn't either give me the expression I'm looking for..
Why is that?
 
  • #13
Ahh but it does! Silly mistake from my part.
Thank you so much it has been a real journey :)

Regards
Cole.
 

Similar threads

Replies
55
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 62 ·
3
Replies
62
Views
14K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K