Equation of motion for charge density

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on modeling the evolution of charge density \(\rho(t)\) for a sphere of charge after it is released, considering only electrostatics without a magnetic field. The initial charge density is defined as \(\rho(0) = Q/V\), and the challenge is to express the equations of motion for charge density rather than individual particles. Suggestions include using the Klimontovich equation from kinetic theory to track charged particles and applying Eulerian dynamics to account for dynamic volume changes. A simpler model assumes spherical symmetry, allowing the calculation of forces on outer electron shells and their subsequent velocities and positions. The outermost shell moves fastest, providing a basis for determining the charge density \(\rho(r,t)\) over time.
Zadig
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Let's say we have a sphere of charge of radius R, volume V, with total charge Q at t=0, so that we can express this as \rho ( 0 ) = Q/V. Now, if we were to "let go" of this clump of charge, the electrons would fly off due to the mutual repulsion. My question is how to model this, ie, how to write this as \rho ( t )?

I can write the equations of motion for an electron originally at r_{\circ} < R, but I want to deal with the charge density as my fundamental object here. I should also mention that for simplicity's sake, I'm only considering electrostatics here, so no B field.

What I'm missing is a way to express equations of motion for a charge density. I tried to guess the Lagrangian for a charge density by setting the charge density equal to a delta function \rho (x&#039;) = q \delta (x&#039; - x(t) ), as a way of modelling a particle of charge q with position x(t).

I feel like this may even be a fluid dynamics problem, with the pressure corresponding to the electrostatic pressure. Would I then just apply Euler's equations of fluid dynamics?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is for a numerical model, correct?

I think fluid dynamics would be a little too crude for this kind of calculation. How about looking into the Klimontovich equation (kinetic theory), and modifying it appropriately for this situation (\vec{B} \equiv 0)? You would track each charged particle, and trace its trajectory by iterating solutions to the continuity equation. If your end interest is to model the charge density, you would need to model the scenario with Eulerian dynamics, and keep account of a dynamic volume so as to calculate the desired parameter. I am not super competent in numerical solutions, so my suggestions can only be vague at best.

The following may be useful: http://accelconf.web.cern.ch/Accelconf/e02/PAPERS/TUPRI113.pdf , but you may find more helpful literature online, that was just the first paper I located.
 
Last edited:
The simplest model might be to assume spherical symmetry, and a total charge Q(r,t) inside radius r at time t. The radial outward force on an electron with charge e at r,t is then

F(r,t) = eQ(r,t)/4πε0r2

No charge at radius r'>r will have any effect on F(r,t). At time zero, the total charge is Q0 = (4/3)πρ0R3, where ρ0 is a uniform charge density inside R.

For the outermost electron shell of thickness dr, at r = R,

F(R,0) = ma = eQ0/4πε0R2

Since this outer shell will always be outside the rest of the charge, the integration of this to obtain a radial velocity v(t) and position r(t) for the outer shell should be simple. Knowing velocities and radial positions at time t of all shells should give the charge density ρ(r,t).

Fortunately, since the charge Q(r,t) inside a radius r scales as ~r3, and the denominator in F(r,t) = eQ(r,t)/4πε0r2 as r2, the fastest moving shell is the outermost shell, and the inner shells are accelerated less.

Bob S
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
338
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
20
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Back
Top