Equation of Motion: Understand Last Sentence

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the interpretation of a statement from a physics book regarding the relationship between coordinates, velocities, and accelerations in the context of motion. It explores the implications of specifying these quantities and the conditions under which the motion of a system can be determined, touching on concepts from Lagrangian and Hamiltonian mechanics.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes that specifying coordinates and velocities allows for the determination of accelerations, suggesting a complete description of the system's state.
  • Another participant argues that the statement is incomplete, emphasizing that forces must also be specified to calculate future motion, as they depend on coordinates and velocities.
  • A different viewpoint supports the original statement, asserting that the Lagrangian formulation accounts for potential energy, which incorporates the necessary dependencies.
  • One participant adds that the correctness of the statement hinges on the assumption that accelerations are independent of time, indicating a condition under which the motion can be uniquely defined.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing interpretations of the original statement, with some agreeing that it is accurate under certain conditions, while others contend that it is misleading without considering forces. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the completeness of the statement.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the importance of specifying forces in relation to the coordinates and velocities, indicating that the discussion is limited by assumptions about the system being analyzed.

rasensuriken
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
I came across this from a book saying that:
If all the co-ordinates and velocities are simultaneously specified, it is known from experience that the state of the system is completely determined and that its subsequent motion can, in principle, be calculated. Mathematically, this means that, if all the co-ordinates q and velocities dq/dt are given at some instant, the accelerations d^{2}q/dt^{2} at that instant are uniquely defined.

May i know what is meant by the last sentence?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is an example of the application of Lagrangian physics. In Lagrangian physics, you can specify the Lagrangian of the system (the difference between the kinetic and potential energies) as a function of position, velocity and time. The integral of the Lagrangian over time is called the action. The equations of motion for a classical system are ones which make the action stationary. This can be solved in a variety of ways.

The associated wiki: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Action_(physics )

So yes, the statement is true but there is a bit of work that you have to do to get the equations of motion out of it. I'm sure you could probably do it also via a different means, maybe using Hamiltonian physics but I am not very familiar with working with Hamiltonians (as horrible as that fact may be) outside of quantum physics.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
rasensuriken said:
...Mathematically, this means that, if all the co-ordinates q and velocities dq/dt are given at some instant, the accelerations d^{2}q/dt^{2} at that instant are uniquely defined.

May i know what is meant by the last sentence?

It is a somewhat wrong statement. The accelerations are also determined with forces that should be given too. The external and inter-particle forces depend on coordinates and velocities, so if the force dependencies are known, the future of the system is calculated from the initial data and the given forces. It is just like for one-particle system: you specify the initial data and a force to calculate the time dependence of your variables.
 
hmm...but i think the book should be more or less accurate...i quote this from the book "Mechanics" by L.D.Landau...i do have the same opinion as yours when i am reading this...But considering Born2bwire's i think the statement is alright, since the Lagrangian is T-U, in which the potential energy also being taken care of (i.e. if U depend on the position then it's being taken into account) =). Thanks everyone =)
 
Last edited:
rasensuriken said:
... Mathematically, this means that, if all the co-ordinates q and velocities dq/dt are given at some instant, the accelerations d2q/dt2 at that instant are uniquely defined. May i know what is meant by the last sentence?
This is correct as long as the accelerations are independent of time. If every parameter is independent of time, then the motion is uniquely defined.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
844
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K