Equation of plane containing 2 lines.

  • Thread starter Thread starter bigbk92
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lines Plane
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on finding the equation of a plane containing two lines represented by symmetric equations. The analysis reveals that for the first set of lines, they are skew due to differing x-values when substituting parameters, indicating no plane exists. The second set of lines is determined to be coincident in the y-z projection, but not perpendicular, suggesting they share a plane. The third set of lines does not meet in the y-z projection, confirming they do not intersect in three-dimensional space. The key takeaway is that the relationships between the lines dictate the existence of a plane.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of parametric equations in three-dimensional space
  • Knowledge of vector operations including dot product and cross product
  • Familiarity with concepts of skew, parallel, and coincident lines
  • Ability to interpret geometric relationships in 3D projections
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of skew lines in three-dimensional geometry
  • Learn how to derive the equation of a plane from a point and a normal vector
  • Explore the implications of coincident lines in vector calculus
  • Investigate the geometric interpretation of dot and cross products in 3D space
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, physics, and engineering who are working with three-dimensional geometry, particularly those dealing with vector analysis and plane equations.

bigbk92
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Find the equation of the plane containing each set of lines with symmetric equations below, if no equation exists, prove it.
1. (x-3)/2 = (y+1)/4 = (z-2)/-1

(x-3)/2 = (y+1)/-2 = (z-3)/2

2. (x-1) = (y+3)/2 = (z+3)/3

(x-3)/3 = (y-1)/6 = (z-3)/9

3. (x-2)/2 = y/5 = (z+3)/6

(x-4)/4 = (y+1)/10 = (z+1)/12


I put the equations in parametric form
1. x = 2t + 3 y = 4t - 1 z = -t +2
x = 5s +3 y = -2s - 1 z = 2s + 3

2. x = t + 1 y = 2t - 3 z = 3t -3
x = 3s + 3 y = 6s +1 z = 9s + 3

3.x = 2t + 2 y = 5t z = 6t - 3
x = 4s + 4 y = 10s - 1 z = 12s - 1



Number 1

using both equations for y and z i solved for s and t. s = -2/3 and t = 1/3. But when s and t are subsituted in the x parmetric equations the values of x are not equal. x = 11/3 for one and 1/3 for another. My question is would this mean the lines are skew and if the lines are skew does that mean there is no equation of a plane that contains both lines.

Number 2

When I equate the eqauation for y to each other and the equations for z to each other and then solve for one of the variables s or t I run into a problem. The equated values to solve for one variable are equal. For example when solving for s i end up with 9s+6 = 9s+6 which is equivalent to 1 = 1. Unsure what that meant i used the dot product of the v vector for each line and found that the angle between the lines is 90 degrees making them perpendicular. My question is there an equation for the plane containing both of these lines. I don't think there is because taking the cross product of the v vectors to find the normal results in all zeros [0,0,0]. That means for any r0 the plane is 0 = 0.

Number 3

I equate the equations of y's together and the equations of z together to find values for t and s. When I would solve for a variable, the variable would cancel out of the equation. For example when solving for s i end up with 12s - 6/5 = 12s +4. This cancels out the s and leaves me with -6/5 = 4. I am not sure how to interpret what that means. So i used the dot product to find the angle between the lines and found that it was 0 degrees. I am pretty sure the lines would intersect at every point then. I can easily find the normal by taking the cross product of the v vectors but what i need to also find for the equation of a plane is a point on that plane. So my question is how would I find a point that lies on the plane that contains both of these lines.

Any help is greatly appreciated because i am stumped on this problem. Thank you in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1. Yes, the lines do not intersect given your parametric equations, because the intersection in the y-z project does not correspond to the same x value. Because the lines intersect in the y-z projection, they are not parallel, therefore they are skew. There is probably a typo in your second set of original equalities for this problem, should "(x-3)/2" be "(x-3)/5"?

2. In that situation, the lines are coincident as far as the y-z projection is concerned. The inferred relationship between t and s can be assessed in the remaining coordinate. I don't find them to be perpendicular.

3. The absence of a solution in that case means that the lines do not meet in the y-z projection (and therefore the 3-space lines also do not meet). They are not necessarily parallel in 3-space though - the x ordinate can be checked against y or z to establish that.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K