What is the role of 'd' in defining a plane's normal form?

  • Thread starter Thread starter sundar0206
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Planes
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding the role of 'd' in the normal form of a plane equation, represented as nx + ny + nz + d = 0. The variable 'd' indicates the distance from the origin of the coordinate system to the plane along the normal vector. It is derived from the equation by rearranging the vector equation of the plane, which involves a point on the plane and its normal vector. Specifically, 'd' can be calculated as d = -(ax_o + by_o + cz_o), where (x_o, y_o, z_o) is a point on the plane. The conversation clarifies that 'd' represents the distance from the origin to the intersection point of a line normal to the plane.
sundar0206
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Hi guys,

I am sort of new here. So I am not pretty sure if I am to post this question in here.

I am a software programmer and I need to write a class for defining a plane. I came across the plane in its normal form nx+ny+nz+d=0

I need to feed in the values of the plane from another part of my program.

I can understand that nx,ny and nz are the normals of the plane. So where does the d come from. How exactly do you arrive at the value of d;

May sound very basic but then it would be nice if some one could help me out
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
The equation should read nxx+nyy+nzz+d=0. d essentially defines how far the plane is from the origin of the coordinate system.
 
If I may rephrase my question:

If the orign of my co ordinate system is (0,0,0) then d is the distance between (0,0,0) and which point on the plane ? Or am I totally misunderstanding this?? Can you please explain
 
Ok, let us first try to come up with the vector equation of the plane, and then we will switch to cartesian coordinates, and you will probbably see how the d comes into play.

A plane is generally uniqely determined by a point call it P_o(x_o,y_o,z_o) and a vector normal on the plane n=<a,b,c>

Now, let P(x,y,z) be any other point in the plane, then its position vector would be:

r=<x,y,z>

while let

r_o=<x_o,y_o,z_o> be the position vector to the point P_o.

Now, if you draw a picture you will se that the following relation holds:

(r-r_o)*n=0

"*" holds for the dot product. Notice that (r-ro) and n are normal vectors.

Now, switching to the coordinate representation of the above vectors we get:

<x-x_o,y-y_o,z-z_o>*<a,b,c>=0=>a(x-x_o)+b(y-y_o)+c(z-z_o)=0

After rearranging the stuff in there we get:

ax+by+cz-(ax_o+by_o+cz_o)=0

So,

d=-(ax_o+by_o+cz_o)
 
oh..
many thanks for explaining stuff to me.. I got confused after looking at many websites none of which gave me what d is .

Thanks anyways
 
sundar0206 said:
If I may rephrase my question:

If the orign of my co ordinate system is (0,0,0) then d is the distance between (0,0,0) and which point on the plane ? Or am I totally misunderstanding this?? Can you please explain
Take a line normal to the plane starting at the origin. This line will hit the plane at a distance d from the origin. The hit point will have coordinates (-dnx,-dny,-dnz)
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top