Equilibrium constant reaction problem

AI Thread Summary
For the equilibrium reaction A2(g) + 4C(g) ⇌ 2AC2(g) with K1 = 4.8, the reverse reaction AC2(g) ⇌ A2(g) + 2C(g) has an equilibrium constant K2. To find K2, the inverse relationship indicates K2 = 1/K1, which is 1/4.8. However, since the coefficients in the reverse reaction are halved, K2 must be calculated as the square root of K1, resulting in K2 = 1/sqrt(4.8). This approach aligns with the theory of equilibrium constants, where changes in stoichiometry affect the constant's value. Understanding these relationships is crucial for solving equilibrium problems accurately.
ahoy hoy
Messages
14
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Given the equilibrium,
A2(g) + 4C(g) 2AC2(g), K1 = 4.8

It follows that, for the reaction,
AC2(g) A2(g) + 2C(g), K2 = X

X would be

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


Since the equation is the inverse, i know to use 1/K1.
The mole ratio of everything is halved- why does this mean taking the square root of K1, considering the solution to x is 1/(sqrt4.8).
I woulda just gone for the other multiple choice option 1/2.4
 
Physics news on Phys.org
yeah you have to take sq root of the inverse.
 
but why...could u relate it to theory?
 
write the expression for eq const for reaction 1 and 2 and subtitute k2 in the exp for k1
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top