MHB Equivalent Rates - Valuation Mathematics

logicandtruth
Messages
14
Reaction score
1
Hi all

I am currently working on questions focusing on valuation mathematics. A question on equivalent rates is perplexing me. The first question is straightforward, but I get stuck on the second question.

Q1. What is the value of the right to receive £100,000 annually in advance in perpetuity assuming a discount rate of 10%?

A1. £1,100,000

The formula below is for a level annuity that is received in perpetuity and in advance. Here in the UK typically commercial property leases are structured so tenants pay rents four times spread evenly over a year.

View attachment 8408

Q2. What is the value of the right to receive £100,000 per annum quarterly in advance in perpetuity assuming an annual nominal rate of 10%?

A. £1,062,344

I tried various iterations of the formula, but can't get the above answer. Any help would be much appreciated
 

Attachments

  • Formula.PNG
    Formula.PNG
    1.5 KB · Views: 108
Mathematics news on Phys.org
logicandtruth said:
Q2. What is the value of the right to receive £100,000 per annum quarterly
in advance in perpetuity assuming an annual nominal rate of 10%?

A. £1,062,344
Rate needs to be converted to the quarterly rate
that results in 10% annual; that rate is ~2.41%:
1.0241^4 = 1.10, so 10% effective.

Bank tatement will look like:
Code:
QUARTER PAYMENT INTEREST  BALANCE
     0                   1,062,344
     0  -25,000       0  1,037,344
     1  -25,000  25,000  1,037,344 : 1037344*.0241= 25000
     2  -25,000  25,000  1,037,344
...and so on till death do you part!
Sooooo...using formula:
PMT/r + PMT = 25000/.0241 + 25000 = 1,062,344

HOKAY?
 
I see where I went wrong, I was incorrectly converting the interest to a quarter rate:

Quarterly rate = (1 + annual rate )(1/4) – 1

Thank you, understood.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Back
Top