B Error in Vector Addition: U & V Perpendicular

Amine_prince
Messages
38
Reaction score
0
i have two unitary vectors in space U and V , U and V are perpendicular .
W is a vector that verifies W ^ V = U - W .
the following resolution is incorrect , i wan't to understand why :

we use (o,U,V,(U^V)) . components of U (1,0,0) , V(0,1,0) , W(a,b,c) where a , b and c are real numbers .
components of W ^ V ( c , 0 , a) . and U - W ( 1-a , -b, -c)
where is the error here ?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Amine_prince said:
i have two unitary vectors in space U and V , U and V are perpendicular .
W is a vector that verifies W ^ V = U - W .
the following resolution is incorrect , i wan't to understand why :

we use (o,U,V,(U^V)) . components of U (1,0,0) , V(0,1,0) , W(a,b,c) where a , b and c are real numbers .
components of W ^ V ( c , 0 , a) . and U - W ( 1-a , -b, -c)
where is the error here ?

I'm not sure about your notation: ^ means vector cross-product? I've always used \times

If so, then you are on the right track. U, V, U \times V can be used as an orthonormal basis. So we can write W as a linear combination:

W = a U + b V + c (U \times V)

Then W \times V = U - W becomes:

(a U + b V + c (U \times V)) \times V = U - a U - b V - c (U \times V)

Now, we use the rules:
X \times X = 0
(X \times Y) \times Z = (X \cdot Z) V - X (Y \cdot Z)

where \cdot is the vector scalar product.

Applying these rules gives us:
a U \times V + 0 + c (U \cdot V) V - c U (V \cdot V) = U - a U - bV - c (U \times V)

This simplifies to:
a U \times V - c U = (1-a)U - b V - c(U \times V)

So if you just pair up the corresponding orthogonal vectors, this gives three equations:
  1. a = -c
  2. 0 = -b
  3. -c = (1-a)
 
thank you sir :)
 
Amine_prince said:
thank you sir :)
Looking at what you wrote, I think that your problem is that

(a, b, c) \times (0,1,0) = (-c, 0, a)
 
yes , i missed the sign . and flipped the numbers by mistake .
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Back
Top