Error propagation and standard deviation

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concepts of error propagation and standard deviation in the context of experimental physics. Participants are exploring how to incorporate errors into standard deviation calculations when comparing measured and theoretical values.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses a desire to understand how to include errors in standard deviation calculations related to their experimental data.
  • Another participant suggests referencing Kline and McClintock's 1953 paper on uncertainty analysis as a foundational resource.
  • A different participant recommends the NIST guidelines as a more current resource for uncertainty analysis.
  • Another participant mentions the GUM (Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement) as an official guide that is also accessible for readers.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not appear to have reached a consensus on a specific method for error propagation and standard deviation, but they provide various resources for further exploration.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference different guidelines and papers, indicating a variety of approaches to error analysis without resolving which is the most appropriate for the original question posed.

Sral2018
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hey there,
First time on this forums, looking forward to some interesting discussions :)
I am currently trying grasp the concepts of error propagation and standard deviation in relation to experimental physics. I have some data set and i want to determine the difference between the measured and theoretical values including errors and how reliable my reading are. My problem is how do i include these errors in the standard deviation?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You might check Kline and McClintock's 1953 paper on uncertainty analysis. It is a standard in the field.
 
There is also the NIST guidelines which are a little more up to date.

https://www.nist.gov/sites/default/files/documents/2017/05/09/tn1297s.pdf
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
7K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K