Escape velocity (from the earth) of the Earth-Sun system

AI Thread Summary
Escape velocity from the Earth-Sun system is calculated by considering both the gravitational pull of the Earth and the Sun, while ignoring other celestial bodies. The escape velocity relative to the Earth can be expressed using the formula v = √(v_E² + (v_S - v_0)²), where v_E is the escape velocity from Earth, v_S is the escape velocity from the Sun, and v_0 is the Earth's orbital velocity. The energy equation for a spacecraft launched from Earth to infinity shows that the total mechanical energy equals zero at launch. Simplifications reveal that the escape velocity is primarily influenced by the Sun's gravitational pull and the Earth's orbital motion. This discussion aims to clarify the solution to a problem from Douglas Giancoli's textbook, which has been noted for its confusing wording.
C. Y. Cheng
Messages
2
Reaction score
1
Escape velocity is an estimate of the launch velocity of a spacecraft (without any propulsion) to overcome a planet system's gravitational pull in order to escape to ``infinity''. In this problem we consider both the gravitational attraction of the Earth and Sun (but ignoring the effects of other bodies in the solar system). Use the following escape velocities from the Earth and from the Sun, and the orbital velocity of the earth:

##v_E =\sqrt{{2 G M_E}/{r_E}}## is the escape velocity from the Earth;
##v_S= \sqrt{{2 G M_S}/{r_{SE}}}## is the escape velocity from the gravitational field of the Sun at the orbit of the Earth, but far away from the Earth's influence;
##v_0## is the orbital velocity of the Earth about the Sun;

to show that the escape velocity (relative to the Earth) from the Earth-Sun system is
$$v = \sqrt{ v_E^2 + (v_S -v_0)^2}.$$

Relevant equations
Gravitational potential of a mass ##m## related to another mass ##M## at distance ##r##:
$$U = - \frac{G M m}{r}.$$

Solution
In the Earth-Sun two-planet system, energy equation (mechanical energy only) for a spacecraft launched from the Earth to infinity can be written as the sum of kinetic energy and the potential energy as follows:
$$ \frac{1}{2} m v_{abs}^2 -\frac{G M_E m}{r_E} - \frac{G M_S m}{r_{SE}} = 0.$$
This is the energy equation using the absolute velocity ##v_{abs}##, or velocity relative to the Sun (assuming the Sun is stationary). On the right-hand side of the equation above, the total energy is zero because its kinetic energy is zero at infinity (since we are looking for the minimum velocity at launch on the surface of Earth), and potential energies at infinity from the Earth and Sun are also zero. So
$$v_{abs}^2= v_E^2 + v_S^2 \implies v_{abs} = \sqrt{v_E^2 + v_S^2}.$$
But the escape velocity we want is relative to the Earth, we have ##v = v_{abs}- v_0## (using the simplest scenario in which the spacecraft is moving in the same direction as the Earth's orbital velocity).

Now we have
$$v^2 = (v_{abs} - v_0)^2 = \left( \sqrt{ v_E^2 + v_S^2} - v_0\right)^2=v_E^2 + v_S^2 + v_0^2 -
2 v_0\sqrt{v_E^2 + v_S^2} $$
Since ##v_E^2 \ll v_S^2##, we can further simplify the above expression by dropping ##v_E## inside the square root to get
$$v^2 \approx v_E^2 + v_S^2 + v_0^2 - 2 v_0 v_S = v_E^2 + (v_S - v_0)^2.$$
So we have got the solution:
$$ v\approx \sqrt{ v_E^2 + (v_S -v_0)^2 }.$$
This is Problem (8.61) from Douglas Giancoli's Physics for Scientists and Engineers. The problem contains a hint, yet its wording is a bit confusing (at least to me). Therefore it prompted me to write this up here. Hope it can be helpful to anybody who is curious about the form of the solution of ##v##.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes Mr. Devisser
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF;
I'm sure this will show up in the google hits for people who get confused with this problem. Well done.
 
@Simon Bridge Thank you for your kind words.

After posting this solution, I was able to see the answer given in the textbook's solution manual. The method there is very confusing. I don't have time to post that solution right now, but I will in a few days.

When I put it up, I'll appreciate it if anyone in the PhysicsForum would make comments.
 
Last edited:
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top