Estimate its capacitance to earth

AI Thread Summary
To estimate the capacitance of a telephone wire suspended 10m above the ground, the mirroring method is recommended rather than the cylindrical capacitor formula, which yielded an incorrect answer. The discussion suggests considering two parallel wires with opposite charges to simplify the problem, maintaining the same electric field. Participants express confusion over the correct approach and seek clarification on applying the mirroring method effectively. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding different methods for calculating capacitance in this context. Overall, the mirroring method is emphasized as the appropriate technique for this scenario.
Ripperbat
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A telephone wire of diameter 1mm is suspended 10m above the ground. Estimate its capacitance to Earth per unit length

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I've tried to solve the problem by using the formula for a cylindrical capacitor and got the answer but apparently it was wrong. Instead it's supposed to be solved by the mirroing method. So now I'm lost. Help me please :)

Thx
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Ripperbat said:

Homework Statement



A telephone wire of diameter 1mm is suspended 10m above the ground. Estimate its capacitance to Earth per unit length

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I've tried to solve the problem by using the formula for a cylindrical capacitor and got the answer but apparently it was wrong. Instead it's supposed to be solved by the mirroing method. So now I'm lost. Help me please :)

Thx


Consider two parallel 1mm thick wires a distance 20m apart with opposite charges, same electric field for the above problem. Does that make things easier? I'm not sure.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top