Evaluate multivariate integral over a simplex - help

winterfors
Messages
70
Reaction score
0
I would need to evaluate the integral

\int\limits_{x\in S}[x+x_A]^TA[x+x_A]\exp\left(-\frac{1}{4}[x+x_B]^TB[x+x_B]\right)dx

where
x is a column n-vector
x_A and x_B are column n-vector constants
A and B are n\times n (symmetrical) matrices

taken over the volume S, which is a n-simplex* in \Re^n.

*A simplex is the convex hull of (volume between) n+1 points in \Re^n. In \Re^2 a simplex is a triangle, in \Re^3 a tetrahedron, etc. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SimplexI have tried to do it analytically, but the interdependence of the integration limits in each dimension (since it's over a simplex) make Matematica or Maple fail to evaluate even simple cases such as for n=2.

Approximating the integrand as a multivariate Taylor series makes it easier to integrate, but does not approximate the integrand very well if you truncate the series at a reasonable degree (the number of terms grows exponentially with the degree for a multivariate Taylor expansion)

Monte Carlo approximation isn't really an option, since I need high numerical efficiency in the evaluation, so I'm really at a loss what to to here.Does anyone have an idea?
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
How did you parameterize the simplex?
 
The simplex is defined by n+1 points in \Re^n. It can be turned into the volume "under" a standard (n-1)-simplex by a linear coordinate transformation, yielding something like

<br /> \int\limits_{x_1=0}^{1}<br /> \int\limits_{x_2=0}^{1-x_1} ...<br /> \int\limits_{x_n=0}^{1-\sum\limits_{i=1}^{n-1}x_i}<br /> [x+x_A]^TA[x+x_A]\exp\left(-\frac{1}{4}[x+x_B]^TB[x+x_B]\right)<br /> dx_n ... dx_2 dx_1 <br />
 
More generally the points can be defined by x=w_1x_1+\ldots+w_{n+1}x_{n+1} where w_1+\ldots+w_{n+1}=1 and 0&lt;=w_k&lt;=1, and this results in a similar integral to the one you wrote.

But there might not be a closed-form solution to more than 1 of the n required integrals anyway.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top