MHB Evaluate Piecewise-Defined Function....2

  • Thread starter Thread starter mathdad
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion evaluates a piecewise-defined function with three segments: y = |x| for -4 ≤ x < 0, y = x^2 for 0 ≤ x < 1, and y = 1/x for 1 ≤ x ≤ 4. For x = 3, the value is calculated as y = 1/3 using the bottom piece. For x = -4, the upper piece gives y = 4. When x = 1/2, the middle piece results in y = 1/4. The evaluation confirms the correctness of these calculations, highlighting the challenges of precalculus.
mathdad
Messages
1,280
Reaction score
0
The following function is a piecewise-defined function.

y = | x | if -4 ≤ x < 0...upper piece

y = x^2 if 0 ≤ x < 1...middle piece

y = 1/x if 1 ≤ x ≤ 4...bottom piece

Evaluate when x = 3, x = -4 and x = 1/2.

For x = 3, use bottom piece.

y = 1/3

For x = -4, use upper piece.

y = | -4 |

y = 4

For x = 1/2, use middle piece

y = (1/2)^2

y = 1/4

Correct?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Yes, correct.
 
Great. Another pad on the back for me. It feels good to get the right answer. Believe it or not, not too many people can handle precalculus. Some people add 1/2 + 3/4 and call themselves a mathematician. If they only knew that math extends beyond elementary school fractions, I think the title of mathematician would go into the toilet.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top