Evaluate this (complicated) integral in two variables

  • Thread starter Thread starter kingwinner
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integral Variables
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The integral discussed is ∞ ∫ [1/(2pi)] [e-(w2+z2w2)/2] |w| dw from w=-∞. To evaluate this integral, first break it into two parts based on the absolute value of w: for w < 0, |w| = -w, and for w > 0, |w| = w. Treat z as a constant during integration with respect to w, and consider using substitution with y = (1 + z)w² to simplify the evaluation process.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of definite integrals and limits
  • Familiarity with absolute value functions in calculus
  • Knowledge of substitution methods in integration
  • Basic concepts of multivariable calculus
NEXT STEPS
  • Study integration techniques involving absolute values
  • Learn about substitution methods in calculus
  • Explore the properties of exponential functions in integrals
  • Investigate the evaluation of integrals in multiple variables
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in calculus, particularly those focusing on integral evaluation and multivariable calculus concepts.

kingwinner
Messages
1,266
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I was doing a statistics problem, and ended up with this integral:

∫ [1/(2pi)] [e-(w2+z2w2)/2] |w| dw
w=-∞
How can I evaluate this?

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


1) How can we integrate |w| (with the absolute value)?
2) What should we do with the z? Can we treat it as a constant here?
3) Do we need integration by parts here? If so, what should u and dv be? Looks like the thing has no antiderivative...

Thanks for helping!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1) Do what you should have learned to do when you first learned about absolute value: break it into "w< 0" and "w> 0". If w< 0, |w|= -w. If w> 0, |w|= w. Do two separate integrals and then add.

2) Yes, since you are not integrating with respect to z, you are looking for a value for each z and should treat it as a constant as far as the integral with respect to w is concerned.

3) Looks to me like a simple substitution. Let y= (1+ z)w2.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K