Evaluating cosine function from ##-\infty## to ##\infty##

happyparticle
Messages
490
Reaction score
24
Homework Statement
Evaluate ##\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} f(x)g(x) dx##
where ##f(x) = \cos (ax) , g(x) = e^{-c^2x^2}##
Relevant Equations
##\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \cos (ax) e^{-c^2x^2} dx##
Hi,
I have some question about evaluating a cosine function from ##-\infty## to ##\infty##.
I saw for a cosine function evaluate from ##-\infty## to ##\infty## I can change the limits from 0 to ##\infty##. I have a idea why, but I can't convince myself, furthermore, is it always the case no matter the cosine function?

Moreover, would it be appropriate to replace ##cos(ax)## for his complex equivalent, thus I will have only 2 exponentials function to deal with.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First, you mean ”integrating”, not “evaluating”.

You can change limits to 0 to infinity (and multiply the result by 2!) because the integrand is even, not because a cosine is involved. For example ##\cos(x + \pi/2)## is not even.

Yes, you can use the identity with the complex exponential.
 
  • Like
Likes happyparticle
Orodruin said:
First, you mean ”integrating”, not “evaluating”.
That was I thought, however in my textbook the term evaluate the integral is used so I choose the word "evaluating". I was wondering if this is similar to integrate.

Thank you for the answer
 
EpselonZero said:
That was I thought, however in my textbook the term evaluate the integral is used so I choose the word "evaluating". I was wondering if this is similar to integrate.

Thank you for the answer
You evaluate the integral to find its value. You do not evaluate the integrand. Saying ”evaluate an integral containing a cosine function” would be correct.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top