Evaluating k-a to k+2a for Limit Sum of k*(p^k)*C

  • Thread starter Thread starter bogdan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Limit Sum
bogdan
Messages
188
Reaction score
0
_____n__________k+a
lim sum k*(p^k)*C = ?
___k=-a_________k+2*a
n->infinity

0<p<1
a>0
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Sorry bogdan I can't read it. Maybe better to write it down, scan it and post the image...
 
it's sum from -a to infinity of

k*(p^k)*(k+2*a)!/[(k+a)!*a!], where k goes from -a to infinity...

a>0;a->integer;0<p<1;

Got it ?
 
Ok!

First step is to get rid of that ungainly k coefficient. Use the manipulations:

k pk = p (k pk-1)
= p (d/dp) (pk)

So letting S be the sum of interest:

S(p) = p (d/dp) &sum pk (k+2a)! / (a! (k+a)!)

The next step is to shift the sum over to 0..&infin by letting k+a = i:

S(p) = p (d/dp) &sum pi-a (i+a)! / (a! i!)
(i = 0 .. &infin)

Factor out the p-a:

S(p) = p (d/dp) (p-a &sum pi (i + a)! / (a! i!) )

What's left is, I think, a fairly standard summation, but I'll be darned if I can remember its value, so I'll have to compute it again:

T(p) = &sum pi (i+a)! / (a! i!)

Use the identity:

(d/dp)a pi+a = (i+a)!/i! pa

T(p) = (d/dp)a &sum pi+a / i!
= (d/dp)a (pa &sum pi/i!)
= (d/dp)a (pa ep)

So if you know exactly what a is, you can compute T(p) from here, and plug its value into S(p).


However, I'm 99% sure you can do much better, and that the sum T(p) has a nice closed form solution you can plug into S(p)... I just can't remember it.

Hurkyl
 
Hurkyl...you're a genius...
(if the solution is correct...because I don't fully understand it...)
Anyway, thanks...my combinatorics skills are so pathetic...
Unfortunately...even though I have that result...it's quite complicated to finish it...and I'm not too happy because that sum is strictly related to a...oh...no...that's a good thing...:smile:
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top