MHB Evaluating $M+N$ Given Triangle Congruency and Side Lengths

  • Thread starter Thread starter anemone
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Triangle
AI Thread Summary
Triangle $ABC$ is congruent to triangle $CDE$, with angles $\angle A$ and $\angle B$ both measuring 80 degrees and side length $AC=1$. The expression for $DG$ is given as $$DG=\frac{2\sin 10^{\circ}}{M+N\sin^2 10^{\circ}}$$, which leads to the equation $2M\sin10^\circ + 2N\sin^310^\circ = 1$. By applying the triple angle formula for sine, the values $M=3$ and $N=-4$ are derived, resulting in $M+N = -1$. The discussion emphasizes the importance of ensuring unique conditions for $M$ and $N$.
anemone
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
3,851
Reaction score
115
View attachment 1354

Given that triangle $ABC$ is congruent to triangle $CDE$, and that $\angle A=\angle B=80^{\circ}$. Suppose that $AC=1$ and $$DG=\frac{2\sin 10^{\circ}}{M+N\sin^2 10^{\circ}}$$.

Evaluate $M+N$.
.
 

Attachments

  • Challenge Problem.JPG
    Challenge Problem.JPG
    2.4 KB · Views: 101
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Re: Evaluate M+N

My solution:

We find that:

$$\angle C=180^{\circ}-2\cdot80^{\circ}=20^{\circ}$$

The Law of Cosines gives us:

$$\overline{CD}^2=2\left(1-\cos\left(20^{\circ} \right) \right)$$

Triangle $CDG$ is similar to the two congruent triangles, hence, we may state:

$$\frac{\overline{CD}}{\overline{DG}}= \frac{1}{\overline{CD}}\implies\overline{DG}= \overline{CD}^2= 2\left(1-\cos\left(20^{\circ} \right) \right)$$

Using a double angle identity for cosine, we may write:

$$\overline{DG}=2\left(1-\left(1-2\sin^2\left(10^{\circ} \right) \right) \right)=4\sin^2\left(10^{\circ} \right)$$

Thus, we see that we require:

$$M+N\sin^2\left(10^{\circ} \right)=\frac{1}{2}\csc^3\left(10^{\circ} \right)$$

With $M=0$, we then have $$M+N=\frac{1}{2}\csc^3\left(10^{\circ} \right)$$
 
Re: Evaluate M+N

[sp]I agree with Mark as far as the line $DG = 4\sin^210^\circ$. But I wanted to express that in the form $$DG=\frac{2\sin 10^{\circ}}{M+N\sin^2 10^{\circ}}$$, with $M$ and $N$ numerical constants (not involving $\sin10^\circ$). So I want to find $M$ and $N$ such that $$4\sin^210^\circ = \frac{2\sin 10^{\circ}}{M+N\sin^2 10^{\circ}}$$, or $2M\sin10^\circ + 2N\sin^310^\circ = 1$.

Remembering that $\sin3\theta = 3\sin\theta - 4\sin^3\theta$ and that $\sin30^\circ = 1/2$, I put $\theta = 10^\circ$, to get $\frac12 = 3\sin10^\circ - 4\sin^310^\circ$. Thus $6\sin10^\circ - 8\sin^310^\circ = 1$. Comparing that with the equation in the previous paragraph, you see that we can take $M=3$, $N=-4$ and hence $M+N = -1$.[/sp]
 
Re: Evaluate M+N

MarkFL said:
My solution:

We find that:

$$\angle C=180^{\circ}-2\cdot80^{\circ}=20^{\circ}$$

The Law of Cosines gives us:

$$\overline{CD}^2=2\left(1-\cos\left(20^{\circ} \right) \right)$$

Triangle $CDG$ is similar to the two congruent triangles, hence, we may state:

$$\frac{\overline{CD}}{\overline{DG}}= \frac{1}{\overline{CD}}\implies\overline{DG}= \overline{CD}^2= 2\left(1-\cos\left(20^{\circ} \right) \right)$$

Using a double angle identity for cosine, we may write:

$$\overline{DG}=2\left(1-\left(1-2\sin^2\left(10^{\circ} \right) \right) \right)=4\sin^2\left(10^{\circ} \right)$$

Thus, we see that we require:

$$M+N\sin^2\left(10^{\circ} \right)=\frac{1}{2}\csc^3\left(10^{\circ} \right)$$

With $M=0$, we then have $$M+N=\frac{1}{2}\csc^3\left(10^{\circ} \right)$$

Hi MarkFL,

Thanks for participating and since the problem doesn't mention any restriction on the variables $M$ and $N$, you got the full credit for your solution! Bravo!

But even though I am not the question setter, I should have noticed when I solved the problem that I should add the condition on both variables so that their sum is unique. I admit I overlooked this. I'm sorry...:o

Opalg said:
[sp]I agree with Mark as far as the line $DG = 4\sin^210^\circ$. But I wanted to express that in the form $$DG=\frac{2\sin 10^{\circ}}{M+N\sin^2 10^{\circ}}$$, with $M$ and $N$ numerical constants (not involving $\sin10^\circ$). So I want to find $M$ and $N$ such that $$4\sin^210^\circ = \frac{2\sin 10^{\circ}}{M+N\sin^2 10^{\circ}}$$, or $2M\sin10^\circ + 2N\sin^310^\circ = 1$.

Remembering that $\sin3\theta = 3\sin\theta - 4\sin^3\theta$ and that $\sin30^\circ = 1/2$, I put $\theta = 10^\circ$, to get $\frac12 = 3\sin10^\circ - 4\sin^310^\circ$. Thus $6\sin10^\circ - 8\sin^310^\circ = 1$. Comparing that with the equation in the previous paragraph, you see that we can take $M=3$, $N=-4$ and hence $M+N = -1$.[/sp]

Hi Opalg,

Thanks for participating and I must tell you when I arrived at the step where I got $2Q\sin^3 10^{\circ}+2P \sin 10^{\circ}-1=0$, I immediately thought of the triple angle formula for the function of sine and you're recent help to me in one of the simultaneous equation threads was the inspiration to me...so, I wouldn't have solved this problem if not for what you have taught me! (Sun)
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top