Evaluating the integral by changing the order

  • Thread starter Vyse007
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Integral
In summary: If that's not the case, then the answer is no, you can't have two regions with the same limits but different coordinates.
  • #1
Vyse007
49
0

Homework Statement


We are told to change the order of the given double integral. It is as follows:-
[tex]\int^{k}_{o}[/tex][tex]\int^{k+\sqrt{k^{2}-y^{2}}}_{-k+\sqrt{k^{2}-y^{2}}}[/tex] f(x,y)dxdy

Homework Equations


The answer that I get after sketching the limits and finding the region is different from the answer given in my book. I would like to ascertain if its me who is wrong or the book(since the book has quite a lot of mistakes).

The Attempt at a Solution


First I sketched the given limits, and I got the upper half of the two given circles since y=0 is also a limit. Then I got a region bounded by the limits. Since it is kinda hard to describe, I am just writing the answer that I am getting after changing the order. It is as follows:-
[tex]\int^{0}_{-k}[/tex][tex]\int^{k}_{\sqrt{k^{2}-(x+k)^{2}}}[/tex] f(x,y)dydx + [tex]\int^{k}_{0}[/tex][tex]\int^{k}_{\sqrt{k^{2}-(x-k)^{2}}}[/tex] f(x,y)dydx

But the answer given in my textbook has three parts, thereby indicating that the region I got is wrong.
Any help pointing me in the right direction would be helpful.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Hmmm...what was the books answer?
 
Last edited:
  • #3
gabbagabbahey said:
Hmmm...what was the books answer?

The book has found some weird regions, and the whole region is divided into three parts, the first of which coincides with the first part of my answer. The whole answer is as follows:-

[tex]\int^{0}_{-k}[/tex][tex]\int^{k}_{\sqrt{k^{2}-(x+k)^{2}}}[/tex] f(x,y) dydx + [tex]\int^{k}_{0}[/tex][tex]\int^{k}_{0}[/tex] f(x,y) dydx + [tex]\int^{2k}_{k}[/tex][tex]\int^{\sqrt{k^{2}-(x-k)^{2}}}_{0}[/tex] f(x,y) dydx.I have no idea how the above answer was formulated. My experience with double integrals and common logic should dictate my original answer, but of course, I may be wrong. Any help?

Thanks in advance.
 
  • #4
I agree with the textbook.

The region you've used is bounded by the upper-right part of the circle [itex](x+k)^2+y^2=k^2[/itex], and the upper-left part of the circle [itex](x-k)^2+y^2=k^2[/itex] (as well as [itex]y=0[/itex] and [itex]y=k[/itex]). However, the original integral covers a region bounded by the upper-right part of the circle [itex](x+k)^2+y^2=k^2[/itex], and the upper-right part of the circle [itex](x-k)^2+y^2=k^2[/itex] (as well as [itex]y=0[/itex] and [itex]y=k[/itex]).
 
  • #6
gabbagabbahey said:
I agree with the textbook.

The region you've used is bounded by the upper-right part of the circle [itex](x+k)^2+y^2=k^2[/itex], and the upper-left part of the circle [itex](x-k)^2+y^2=k^2[/itex] (as well as [itex]y=0[/itex] and [itex]y=k[/itex]). However, the original integral covers a region bounded by the upper-right part of the circle [itex](x+k)^2+y^2=k^2[/itex], and the upper-right part of the circle [itex](x-k)^2+y^2=k^2[/itex] (as well as [itex]y=0[/itex] and [itex]y=k[/itex]).

I don't get it completely...

The question given just describes a double integral, and the region. Sketching the region gives me the upper half of the two circles. Now the region that is bounded by the two curves is the region in between the two circles, right? I don't get how the upper right part of the circle [itex](x-k)^2+y^2=k^2[/itex] is supposed to count, since the limits do not mention anything like that. Also, the original integral just mentions the two circles and y=k.
Kindly elaborate it a little bit.

One more question:-
If the books answer is correct, then on the basis of symmetry, I can have the upper left of the circle [itex](x-k)^2+y^2=k^2[/itex] and the upper right and left of the circle [itex](x+k)^2+y^2=k^2[/itex], right(by changing the appropriate limits in the answer, of course)?
 
  • #7
Vyse007 said:
I don't get it completely...

I don't get how the upper right part of the circle [itex](x-k)^2+y^2=k^2[/itex] is supposed to count, since the limits do not mention anything like that. Also, the original integral just mentions the two circles and y=k.
Kindly elaborate it a little bit.

Let's take a look at the limits of your original integral; specifically, what does the upper [itex]x[/itex] limit, [itex]k+\sqrt{k^2-y^2}[/itex], vary from/to as [itex]y[/itex] ranges from zero to [itex]k[/itex]? What part of the circle does that curve describe?

One more question:-
If the books answer is correct, then on the basis of symmetry, I can have the upper left of the circle [itex](x-k)^2+y^2=k^2[/itex] and the upper right and left of the circle [itex](x+k)^2+y^2=k^2[/itex], right(by changing the appropriate limits in the answer, of course)?

That's only true if [itex]f(x,y)=f(-x,y)[/itex] (i.e. if [itex]f[/itex] is also symmetric about the y-axis)
 
  • #8
gabbagabbahey said:
Let's take a look at the limits of your original integral; specifically, what does the upper [itex]x[/itex] limit, [itex]k+\sqrt{k^2-y^2}[/itex], vary from/to as [itex]y[/itex] ranges from zero to [itex]k[/itex]? What part of the circle does that curve describe?

OK...I think I get it now. Thanks a lot for your help, for without it I would have never known where I was going wrong.
But the question was tricky. If I didnt see the answer in the book, I would still be believing that my original answer was correct!

Once again thanks for all your efforts. Am glad to be a part of the Physics Forums community.
 
  • #9
Oh yeah...one last thing.

Do I have to mark this thread as "solved" or something like that? If yes, then from where? I couldn't find an option(maybe I didnt look too well?).
 
  • #10
God I hate it when the surface isn't the sphere at infinity, and the contents haven't decayed exponentially...
 

1. What is the purpose of changing the order of integration in evaluating an integral?

Changing the order of integration can make it easier to evaluate an integral by simplifying the integrand or reducing the number of steps needed to solve the integral.

2. How do I determine the appropriate order of integration to use?

The appropriate order of integration can be determined by considering the shape and boundaries of the region being integrated over. It is important to choose an order that allows for the easiest evaluation of the integral.

3. Can changing the order of integration affect the value of the integral?

No, changing the order of integration does not affect the value of the integral as long as the limits of integration remain the same.

4. What are some common techniques for changing the order of integration?

Some common techniques for changing the order of integration include using geometric transformations, converting to polar or spherical coordinates, and using trigonometric identities.

5. Are there any limitations to changing the order of integration?

Yes, there are some situations where changing the order of integration may not be possible or may not result in a simpler evaluation. It is important to carefully consider the integral before attempting to change the order of integration.

Similar threads

  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
20
Views
454
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
15
Views
784
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
8
Views
760
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
109
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
821
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
757
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
8
Views
874
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
14
Views
2K
Back
Top