Evaluating the Integral of a Vector Field Using Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on evaluating the integral of a vector field using the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality. The author demonstrates that the absolute value of the integral is bounded by the maximum absolute value of the integrand multiplied by the arc length of the contour. They clarify that this result stems from the properties of continuous functions over closed and bounded contours, ensuring the existence of a maximum value. The argument emphasizes that the integral can be expressed as a limit of sums, reinforcing the application of the triangle inequality. Overall, the analysis concludes that the problem is more straightforward than initially perceived.
PhDeezNutz
Messages
849
Reaction score
557
Homework Statement
Prove that ## \left| \int_C f \left(z \right) \, dz \right| \leq \left|f \right|_{max} \cdot L## where ##\left|f \right|_{max}## is the maximum value o ##\left|f(z) \right|## on the contour and ##L## is the arc length of the contour
Relevant Equations
Any complex valued function is of the form ##f \left(z\right) = u \left(x,y\right) + i v\left(x,y\right)##

I think throughout this I need to use the triangle inequality repeatedly

##\left|\vec{a} + \vec{b} \right| \leq \left| \vec{a}\right| + \left|\vec{b} \right|##

Also the Cauchy Schwarz Inequality

##\left| \vec{a} \cdot \vec{b} \right| \leq \left| \vec{a} \right| \left| \vec{b} \right|##

Just for good measure

##\left| f \left(z\right) \right| = \sqrt{u^2 + v^2}##
Here is my attempt (Note:

## \left| \int_{C} f \left( z \right) \, dz \right| \leq \left| \int_C udx -vdy +ivdx +iudy \right|##

##= \left| \int_{C} \left( u+iv, -v +iu \right) \cdot \left(dx, dy \right) \right| ##

Here I am going to surround the above expression with another set of absolute value bars

##\leq \left| \left| \int_{C} \left( u+iv, -v +iu \right) \cdot \left(dx, dy \right) \right| \right| ##

Appealing to Cauchy-Schwarz
##\leq \left| \left| \int_{C} \left| \left( u+iv, -v +iu \right)\right| \left| \left(dx, dy \right)\right| \right| \right| ##

taking the dot product of the newly defined vector field with itself and noting that cross terms vanish

## = \left| \left| \int_{C} \sqrt{u^2 + v^2}\left| \left(dx,dy\right)\right| \right| \right| \leq \left| \left(\sqrt{u^2 + v^2} \right)_{max} \int_{C} \left| \left(dx,dy\right) \right| \right|##

## \leq f_{max} L##
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Sorry for the bad LaTeX disaster I think it's fixed now
 
Actually this problem is more trivial than I thought! An absolute value of an integral of a function over an interval (even if the function and interval is complex) cannot be bigger than the max absolute (a real constant) value of the integrand (on the interval/path) integrated over the contour. Since the max absolute value is a constant we can pull it out of the integral. The only thing left in the integrand is the arc length.
 
For the purposes of a rigorous proof, if you write the integral as the limit of a sum, this is just the triangle inequality, plus the absolute value can pass through the limit since it's a continuous function.

Your intuition in your second post sounds right to me.
 
Just some technical points: I assume your f is Analytic, or at least continuous over the contour,. Contour is closed and bounded, therefore contact. That way U,V, and therefore f is guaranteed to have a maximum, as a continuous function defined in a compact set..
 
First, I tried to show that ##f_n## converges uniformly on ##[0,2\pi]##, which is true since ##f_n \rightarrow 0## for ##n \rightarrow \infty## and ##\sigma_n=\mathrm{sup}\left| \frac{\sin\left(\frac{n^2}{n+\frac 15}x\right)}{n^{x^2-3x+3}} \right| \leq \frac{1}{|n^{x^2-3x+3}|} \leq \frac{1}{n^{\frac 34}}\rightarrow 0##. I can't use neither Leibnitz's test nor Abel's test. For Dirichlet's test I would need to show, that ##\sin\left(\frac{n^2}{n+\frac 15}x \right)## has partialy bounded sums...