Evaluating the Svein-Graham Sum

  • Thread starter Thread starter 6c 6f 76 65
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sum
6c 6f 76 65
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
Good evening dearest physicians and mathematicians,

I recently came across the so-called "Svein-Graham sum", and i wondered: is it possible to find a simple formula for evaluating it?
\sum_{i=0}^k x\uparrow\uparrow i = \left .1+x+x^x+x^{x^x}+ ... +x^{x^{x^{x^{.^{.^{.^x}}}}}}\right \}k
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hi, I use Mathematica to define a function sg[x,k] to calculate the Svein-Graham sum and plot some figures for ##x \in [1,2]## with ##k## varies from 1 to 5.
Code:
sg[x_, k_] := Module[{f},
  f[y_] := #^y &;
  (FoldList[f[x], x, Range[k - 1]] // Total) + 1]
Plot[sg[x, #], {x, 1, 2}] & /@ Range[1, 5]
 
Last edited:
Quantioner said:
Hi, I use Mathematica to define a function sg[x,k] to calculate the Svein-Graham sum and plot some figures for ##x \in [1,2]## with ##k## varies from 1 to 5.
Code:
sg[x_, k_] := Module[{f},
  f[y_] := #^y &;
  (FoldList[f[x], x, Range[k - 1]] // Total) + 1]
Plot[sg[x, #], {x, 1, 2}] & /@ Range[1, 5]
I was looking for a more analytic expression like \sum_{i=1}^n i = \frac{n(n+1)}{2}. Maybe it's possible to find yet another connection to the Bernoulli numbers? But thank you nevertheless!
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top