Even light would take an infinite time

goedelite
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
Thus wrote PAM Dirac in his little monograph, "General Theory of Relativity", p.34t. More fully, "Even a light signal would take an infinite time to cross the boundary r = 2m, as we can easily check."

Yes, we can, and I did easily by setting ds = 0 in the Schwarzschild solution for a particle described by radially symmetric coordinates with a static metric. The time for transit is governed by a log function of the radius, r, for an observer in the fixed coordinate system and is infinite for him (or her!)

Please someone, kindly explain how this result is consistent with the constancy of the speed of light. The distance to the point at which r = 2m is a determined quantity. If the speed of light does not change, how can the time to traverse it be other than finite for the fixed observer?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The constancy of the speed of light is true locally.
 
Vanadium 50: Thanks you your reply, but I find it too concise for my understanding. I was under the impression that one of the two principles of relativity in the constancy of the speed of light. I have not, until now, read that the speed of light is constant locally. I do not know what locally means in this regard. In the context of my question, the fixed observer is using a coordinate system that describes events in the three space r > 2m. In this locality, the time of transit grows without limit as the light approaches r = 2m + . I am making no reference to what happens inside this region, because the coordinates are not used therein - though the solution is analytically continued. Why is this external sphere not in his locality?
 
goedelite said:
If the speed of light does not change, how can the time to traverse it be other than finite for the fixed observer?
Because the Schwarzschild t coordinate does not measure local time, and the Schwarzschild r coordinate does not measure local distance. Both need to be converted (using the metric) before you can measure the local speed of light, which is always c.

To calculate local radial distance (for a local hovering observer), put dt=d\phi=d\theta=0 in the metric.

To calculate local time (for a local hovering observer), put dr=d\phi=d\theta=0 in the metric.
 
Last edited:
Dr Greg, I think I see what you mean: we can say dx = c dt, but to integrate to finite distances we must use the metric, and that is where the time interval grows without bound. Thanks much!
 
I asked a question here, probably over 15 years ago on entanglement and I appreciated the thoughtful answers I received back then. The intervening years haven't made me any more knowledgeable in physics, so forgive my naïveté ! If a have a piece of paper in an area of high gravity, lets say near a black hole, and I draw a triangle on this paper and 'measure' the angles of the triangle, will they add to 180 degrees? How about if I'm looking at this paper outside of the (reasonable)...
From $$0 = \delta(g^{\alpha\mu}g_{\mu\nu}) = g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} + g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu}$$ we have $$g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} = -g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \,\, . $$ Multiply both sides by ##g_{\alpha\beta}## to get $$\delta g_{\beta\nu} = -g_{\alpha\beta} g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \qquad(*)$$ (This is Dirac's eq. (26.9) in "GTR".) On the other hand, the variation ##\delta g^{\alpha\mu} = \bar{g}^{\alpha\mu} - g^{\alpha\mu}## should be a tensor...
Back
Top